GENOMIC DIVERGENCE OF ALLOPATRIC SIBLING SPECIES STUDIED BY MOLECULAR CYTOGENETICS OF THEIR F1 HYBRIDS

被引:35
|
作者
PAROKONNY, AS
KENTON, AY
MEREDITH, L
OWENS, SJ
BENNETT, MD
机构
[1] UKRAINIAN ACAD SCI, INST CELL BIOL & GENET ENGN, LEBEDEVA ST 1, KIEV 252143, UKRAINE, USSR
[2] ROYAL BOT GARDENS, JODRELL LAB, RICHMOND TW9 3DS, SURREY, ENGLAND
来源
PLANT JOURNAL | 1992年 / 2卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-313X.1992.tb00138.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Despite their similar karyotype morphology and close taxonomic affinity, the genomes of allopatric sibling species, Gibasis karwinskyana and Gibasis consobrina, are clearly distinguished in metaphases of their F1 hybrids by genomic in-situ hybridization (GISH). The reduced ability of chromosomes from one species to bind labelled total DNA from the other involves almost the whole chromosome complement, and is equally pronounced in euchromatin and heterochromatin. The only region strongly conserved in the two species is an AT-rich band proximal to each nucleolus organizer. Molecular differentiation is accompanied by chromosome pairing failure in the F1 interspecific hybrids, although the reason remains open to question. The two species also differ in their numbers of detectable sites for rRNA genes. The greater number of such sites in G. consobrina may be linked with a propensity for interchange heterozygosity. The ability to discriminate rapidly and reliably between the chromosomes of close relatives with almost identical karyotypes makes GISH invaluable in preliminary studies of phylogeny. Detection of even small conserved chromosome bands using GISH confirms the sensitivity of the technique and demonstrates its potential use in evolutionary cytogenetics. This will allow rapid re-evaluation of many important genetic systems exposed by classical cytogenetics in previous decades.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 704
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MORPHOLOGICAL VARIATION OF GERBERA F1 HYBRIDS
    Rivera-Colin, Azucena
    Mejia-Carranza, Jaime
    Martinez-Estrada, Imelda
    Reyes-Aleman, Juan C.
    Gonzalez-Huerta, Andres
    Ramirez-Gerardo, Marithza G.
    REVISTA FITOTECNIA MEXICANA, 2021, 44 (03) : 381 - 389
  • [22] Chromosomal profile in F1 Yak hybrids
    Das, D. W.
    Basumatary, R.
    Phukan, A.
    Sarkar, M.
    INDIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2008, 85 (02): : 164 - 166
  • [23] INHERITANCE OF RAPDS IN F1 HYBRIDS OF CORN
    HEUN, M
    HELENTJARIS, T
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1993, 85 (08) : 961 - 968
  • [24] CHLOROPHYLL VARIEGATION IN F1 OENOTHERA HYBRIDS
    STINSON, HT
    GENETICS, 1957, 42 (04) : 399 - 399
  • [25] Chromatin composition in maize F1 hybrids
    Rayburn, AL
    Bashir, A
    Biradar, DP
    MAYDICA, 1997, 42 (04): : 393 - 399
  • [26] MALTING QUALITY IN F1 HYBRIDS OF BARLEY
    RASMUSSON, DC
    UPADHYAYA, BR
    GLASS, RL
    CROP SCIENCE, 1966, 6 (04) : 339 - +
  • [27] GROWTH OF MAMMARY TUMOURS IN F1 HYBRIDS
    WALLACE, AC
    NATURE, 1965, 207 (4994) : 309 - &
  • [28] DNA methylation remodeling in F1 hybrids
    Kakoulidou, Ioanna
    Johannes, Frank
    PLANT JOURNAL, 2024, 118 (03): : 671 - 681
  • [29] Impact of Asymmetrical Hybridization Followed By Sterile F1 Hybrids on Species Replacement in Pseudorasbora
    Mayu Konishi
    Keisuke Takata
    Conservation Genetics, 2004, 5 : 463 - 474
  • [30] Gut microbiome of juvenile coregonid fishes: comparison of sympatric species and their F1 hybrids
    Belkova, Natalia L.
    Sidorova, Tuyana V.
    Glyzina, Olga Y.
    Yakchnenko, Veronika M.
    Sapozhnikova, Yulia P.
    Bukin, Yurij S.
    Baturina, Olga A.
    Sukhanova, Lyubov V.
    FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED LIMNOLOGY, 2017, 189 (03) : 279 - 290