THEY SHOOT HORSES, DON'T THEY? HOW VALID ARE THE ARGUMENTS OF OPPONENTS AGAINST EUTHANASIA?
被引:0
|
作者:
Martens, Willem H. J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
W Kahn Inst Theoret Psychiat & Neurosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
European Commiss Leonardo da Virci, Utrecht, Netherlands
Royal Coll Psychiatrists, Philosophy Interest Grp, London, EnglandW Kahn Inst Theoret Psychiat & Neurosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
Martens, Willem H. J.
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] W Kahn Inst Theoret Psychiat & Neurosci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] European Commiss Leonardo da Virci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Royal Coll Psychiatrists, Philosophy Interest Grp, London, England
来源:
MEDICINE AND LAW
|
2009年
/
28卷
/
04期
关键词:
Euthanasia;
Unbearable Suffering;
Right to Self-Determination;
Professional Obligation;
Physician's Oath;
Moral Objections;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
D9 [法律];
DF [法律];
学科分类号:
0301 ;
摘要:
In this article the arguments against euthanasia are examined. One of the weightiest arguments of mental health professionals against the practice of euthanasia is that a doctor's active commitment to euthanasia can be interpreted as causing harm. It is investigated whether this statement can be ethically justified on the basis of the text of the medical oath or medical declaration. Furthermore, it will be discussed whether it is ethically acceptable when doctors refuse a) to help candidates of euthanasia who (would likely) meet the legal standards of euthanasia, or b) to refer them to a colleague.