Preference of Corrective Feedback Approaches Perceived by Native English Teachers and Students

被引:0
作者
Park, Gipyo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Asan, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept English Language & Literature, Asan, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL | 2010年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
second/foreign language learning; corrective feedback; error correction; individual difference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated teachers' choice and students' preference of corrective feedback by 24 native English teachers and 51 university students taking English conversation in the EFL context of Korea, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data. The results of the quantitative data analysis were: 1) all of the groups. teachers, students, the high proficient students (HPSs), and the low proficient students (LPSs)-preferred recast the most out of the five approaches of corrective feedback proposed by Lyster and Ranta (1997) and 2) the explicit correction approach was the only statistically significant variable in the comparison between groups: teachers versus students and the HPSs versus the LPSs. The results of the qualitative data analysis were: 1) both teachers and students showed individual differences as well as group differences of corrective feedback, which might result in statistical insignificance in the overall group comparison in the quantitative data and 2) some of the teachers and students perceived clarification request, elicitation, and repetition as measuring the same construct of implicit correction. This study concludes with teaching implications and future study areas for corrective feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 52
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Canvas Mobile Application for English Language Learning through Corrective Feedback
    Guanuche, Adriana
    Eiriz, Osana
    Espi, Roberto
    Caiza, Gustavo
    2022 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, ICISE 2022, 2022, : 10 - 15
  • [42] Malaysian ESL Teachers' Practice of Written Feedback on Students' Writing
    Razali, Khairil Azwar
    Rahman, Zainurin Abdul
    Ahmad, Ismail Sheikh
    Othman, Joharry
    PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2021, 29 : 47 - 67
  • [43] Repair with confianza: Rethinking the context of corrective feedback for English learners (ELs)
    Razfar, Aria
    ENGLISH TEACHING-PRACTICE AND CRITIQUE, 2010, 9 (02) : 11 - 31
  • [44] The effect of corrective feedback from female teachers on formative assessments: educational resilience, educational belongingness, and academic procrastination in an English language course
    Dong, Yifan
    Izadpanah, Siros
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 42 (33) : 29734 - 29734
  • [45] A cross-cultural comparison in pedagogical beliefs about oral corrective feedback: the case of English language teachers in China versus the US
    Mahalingappa, Laura
    Polat, Nihat
    Wang, Rui
    LANGUAGE AWARENESS, 2022, 31 (04) : 410 - 430
  • [46] Teachers' beliefs and practices about oral corrective feedback in university EFL classes
    Yuksel, Dogan
    Soruc, Adem
    McKinley, Jim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2021, 31 (03) : 362 - 382
  • [47] Irinan EFL Teachers' Preferences For Corrective Feedback Types, implicit Vs Explicit
    Motlagh, Leily Nekuruh
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2ND GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON CONFERENCE ON LINGUISTICS AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2015, 192 : 364 - 370
  • [48] EFL Teachers' L1 Backgrounds, Beliefs, and the Characteristics of Their Corrective Feedback
    Asari, Yoko
    JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2019, 16 (01): : 250 - 266
  • [49] The Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback Techniques on EFL Students' Writing
    Eslami, Elham
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CURRENT TRENDS IN ELT, 2014, 98 : 445 - 452
  • [50] Understanding the Significance of EFL Students' Perceptions and Preferences of Written Corrective Feedback
    Rasool, Ushba
    Qian, Jiancheng
    Aslam, Muhammad Zammad
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):