Preference of Corrective Feedback Approaches Perceived by Native English Teachers and Students

被引:0
作者
Park, Gipyo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Asan, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Dept English Language & Literature, Asan, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL | 2010年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
second/foreign language learning; corrective feedback; error correction; individual difference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigated teachers' choice and students' preference of corrective feedback by 24 native English teachers and 51 university students taking English conversation in the EFL context of Korea, utilizing both quantitative and qualitative data. The results of the quantitative data analysis were: 1) all of the groups. teachers, students, the high proficient students (HPSs), and the low proficient students (LPSs)-preferred recast the most out of the five approaches of corrective feedback proposed by Lyster and Ranta (1997) and 2) the explicit correction approach was the only statistically significant variable in the comparison between groups: teachers versus students and the HPSs versus the LPSs. The results of the qualitative data analysis were: 1) both teachers and students showed individual differences as well as group differences of corrective feedback, which might result in statistical insignificance in the overall group comparison in the quantitative data and 2) some of the teachers and students perceived clarification request, elicitation, and repetition as measuring the same construct of implicit correction. This study concludes with teaching implications and future study areas for corrective feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 52
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Different Students, Different Corrective Feedback
    施瑞
    校园英语, 2016, (13) : 18 - 21
  • [12] Students' perceptions of teachers' feedback practice in teaching English as a foreign language
    Vattoy, Kim-Daniel
    Smith, Kari
    TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 85 : 260 - 268
  • [13] Students' Perceptions of Teachers' Corrective Feedback, Basic Psychological Needs and Subjective Vitality: A Multilevel Approach
    Vergara-Torres, Argenis P.
    Tristan, Jose
    Lopez-Walle, Jeanette M.
    Gonzalez-Gallegos, Alejandra
    Pappous, Athanasios
    Tomas, Ines
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [14] Exploring Student Errors, Teachers' Corrective Feedback, Learner Uptake and Repair, and Learners' Preferences of Corrective Feedback
    Sung, Ko-Yin
    Tsai, Hsiao-Mei
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2014, 4 (01): : 37 - 54
  • [15] EFL Students' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Corrective Feedback on Their Written Tasks
    Bal, Nur Gedik
    HACETTEPE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2022, 37 (03): : 1116 - 1129
  • [16] The Efficacy of Continuous Corrective Feedback on Writings of Saudi EFL Students
    Chaudhary, Anjum
    ARAB WORLD ENGLISH JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (04) : 386 - 397
  • [17] An Investigation into Teachers' Corrective Feedback in Chinese EFL Classrooms
    Xu Shanshan
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2012, 35 (04) : 480 - 505
  • [18] NEGOTIATION OF MEANING AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN JAPANESE/ENGLISH eTANDEM
    Bower, Jack
    Kawaguchi, Satomi
    LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 15 (01): : 41 - 71
  • [19] Effectiveness of teachers' direct and indirect written corrective feedback provision strategies on enhancing students' writing achievement: Ethiopian university entrants in focus
    Wondim, Baymot Mekuriaw
    Bishaw, Kassie Shifere
    Zeleke, Yinager Teklesellassie
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (02)
  • [20] Teacher Written Feedback on English as a Foreign Language Learners' Writing: Examining Native and Nonnative English-Speaking Teachers' Practices in Feedback Provision
    Cheng, Xiaolong
    Zhang, Lawrence Jun
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12