A RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL OF BETAMETHASONE FOR THE PREVENTION OF RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME AT 24 TO 28 WEEKS GESTATION

被引:142
|
作者
GARITE, TJ [1 ]
RUMNEY, PJ [1 ]
BRIGGS, GG [1 ]
HARDING, JA [1 ]
NAGEOTTE, MP [1 ]
TOWERS, CV [1 ]
FREEMAN, RK [1 ]
机构
[1] LONG BEACH MEM WOMENS HOSP,LONG BEACH,CA
关键词
CORTICOSTEROIDS; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; PREMATURITY;
D O I
10.1016/0002-9378(92)91691-3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Previous randomized controlled studies of corticosteroids for the reduction of respiratory distress syndrome have failed to demonstrate benefit in very early premature gestational age groups. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of betamethasone given to mothers with intact membranes and threatened premature delivery between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy was conducted. Thirty-six patients were randomized to receive betamethasone, two doses of 12 mg, 24 hours apart, and 41 received placebo. No difference was found in the overall incidence of respiratory distress syndrome between the two groups (betamethasone vs placebo 0.55 vs 0.66) or in the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome in babies delivered between 1 and 7 days after the first dose of drug (betamethasone vs placebo 0.78 vs 0.88). Nor were there any differences observed in any measure of severity of respiratory distress syndrome between the groups. The neonatal death rates were also similar (betamethasone vs placebo 0.25 vs 0.24). The only difference seen was an unexpected reduction in the betamethasone group in the incidence of grades 3 and 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (betamethasone vs placebo 1/31 vs 9/36, p = 0.01). Therefore this study was unable to demonstrate any beneficial effect of corticosteroids in reducing respiratory distress syndrome at < 28 weeks' gestation in spite of a sample size that had an 80% likelihood of detecting a 50% reduction in the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome with p = 0.05, which is the minimum reduction seen in virtually all randomized trials in other gestational age groups.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 651
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome
    Sinha, SK
    Lacaze-Masmonteil, T
    Soler, AVI
    Wiswell, TE
    Gadzinowski, J
    Hajdu, J
    Bernstein, G
    d'Agostino, R
    PEDIATRICS, 2005, 115 (04) : 1030 - 1038
  • [42] Effects of L-carnitine supplementation on respiratory distress syndrome development and prognosis in premature infants: A single blind randomized controlled trial
    Ozturk, Mehmet Adnan
    Kardas, Zehra
    Kardas, Fatih
    Gunes, Tamer
    Kurtoglu, Selim
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2016, 11 (03) : 1123 - 1127
  • [43] The evaluation of the efficacy and safety of non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in combination with INtubation-SURfactant-Extubation technique for infants at 28 to 33 weeks of gestation with respiratory distress syndrome
    Miyahara, Jun
    Sugiura, Hiroshi
    Ohki, Shigeru
    SAGE OPEN MEDICINE, 2019, 7
  • [44] Efficacy of dexamethasone treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19: study protocol for a randomized controlled superiority trial
    Jesús Villar
    José M. Añón
    Carlos Ferrando
    Gerardo Aguilar
    Tomás Muñoz
    José Ferreres
    Alfonso Ambrós
    César Aldecoa
    Fernando Suárez-Sipmann
    Kevin E. Thorpe
    Peter Jüni
    Arthur S. Slutsky
    Trials, 21
  • [45] Efficacy of dexamethasone treatment for patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19: study protocol for a randomized controlled superiority trial
    Villar, Jesus
    Anon, Jose M.
    Ferrando, Carlos
    Aguilar, Gerardo
    Munoz, Tomas
    Ferreres, Jose
    Ambros, Alfonso
    Aldecoa, Cesar
    Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando
    Thorpe, Kevin E.
    Juni, Peter
    Slutsky, Arthur S.
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [46] Initial Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Armanian, Amir-Mohammad
    Badiee, Zohreh
    Heidari, Ghobad
    Feizi, Awat
    Salehimehr, Nima
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 5 (12) : 1543 - 1551
  • [47] Initial synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation versus assist/control ventilation in treatment of moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Luo, Jian
    Wang, Mao-Yun
    Liang, Bin-Miao
    Yu, He
    Jiang, Fa-Ming
    Wang, Ting
    Shi, Chao-Li
    Li, Pei-Jun
    Liu, Dan
    Wu, Xiao-Ling
    Liang, Zong-An
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2015, 7 (12) : 2262 - 2273
  • [48] Early Routine versus Late Selective Surfactant in Preterm Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kandraju, Hemasree
    Murki, Srinivas
    Subramanian, Sreeram
    Gaddam, Pramod
    Deorari, Ashok
    Kumar, Praveen
    NEONATOLOGY, 2013, 103 (02) : 148 - 154
  • [49] Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) vs. Intubation Surfactant Extubation (InSurE) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pareek, Prince
    Deshpande, Sujata
    Suryawanshi, Pradeep
    Sah, Love Kumar
    Chetan, Chinmay
    Maheshwari, Rajesh
    More, Kiran
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2021, 67 (04)
  • [50] A pilot study of evaluation of semi-rigid and flexible catheters for less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome—a randomized controlled trial
    Lorenz Auer-Hackenberg
    Johannes Brandner
    Edda Hofstätter
    Patricia Stroicz
    Tobias Hager
    Anna Eichhorn
    Sebastian Schütz
    Raphael Feldner
    Martin Wald
    BMC Pediatrics, 22