Glenohumeral instability: Validity of low-field MRI for diagnosis of labral tears

被引:1
|
作者
Bartolome, A. [1 ]
Pirogova, T. [1 ]
Bartolome, M. J. [2 ]
Sanchez, R. [3 ]
Garcia de Lucas, F. [3 ]
机构
[1] FREMAP MAJADAHONDA Hosp, Dept Radiol, Madrid, Spain
[2] LA MILAGROSA Hosp, Dept Radiol, Madrid, Spain
[3] FREMAP MAJADAHONDA Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Madrid, Spain
来源
关键词
Labral tear; Bankart lesion; SLAP lesion; Perthes lesion; ALPSA lesion;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.09.009
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To analyze the MRI findings of a series of patients with symptoms of glenohumeral instability and determine whether the diagnosis of a torn labrum can be confirmed by surgical exploration. Materials and methods: Between January 2005 and January 2011, low-field MRI was performed in a total of 190 patients. Surgical treatment was administered to 127 patients, and only 62 of them were subjected to diagnostic arthroscopy. Results: A total of 127 patients (66.8%) underwent surgery. The most frequent surgical procedure was Arthroscopic Bankart Repair (62 cases, 48.8%) with a total number of correct MRI-based labral tear diagnoses of 50 (overall predictive value: 83.3%). Discussion: The analysis found nearly 80% correct labral tear diagnoses. The majority of errors were related to the diagnosis of SLAP lesions and attributable to several factors. Conclusion: Low-field MRI is an appropriate method to diagnose labral tears, with sensitivity levels of 83.3%. Nevertheless, in order to correctly determine the type of lesion present it is advisable, though not indispensable, to carry out a direct MR arthrogram, except in the case of SLAP lesions, where diagnosis is virtually impossible without the addition of intraarticular contrast (unless patients with glenohumeral effusion). (C) 2016 The Egyptian Society of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. Production and hosting by Elsevier.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1528
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a mobile low-field MRI scanner
    Sean C. L. Deoni
    Paul Medeiros
    Alexandra T. Deoni
    Phoebe Burton
    Jennifer Beauchemin
    Viren D’Sa
    Eddy Boskamp
    Samantha By
    Chris McNulty
    William Mileski
    Brian E. Welch
    Matthew Huentelman
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [32] New challenges and opportunities for low-field MRI
    Anoardo, Esteban
    Rodriguez, Gonzalo G.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE OPEN, 2023, 14-15
  • [33] Trabecular bone characterization with low-field MRI
    Remy, F
    Guillot, G
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1998, 16 (5-6) : 639 - 642
  • [34] Brain imaging with portable low-field MRI
    W. Taylor Kimberly
    Annabel J. Sorby-Adams
    Andrew G. Webb
    Ed X. Wu
    Rachel Beekman
    Ritvij Bowry
    Steven J. Schiff
    Adam de Havenon
    Francis X. Shen
    Gordon Sze
    Pamela Schaefer
    Juan Eugenio Iglesias
    Matthew S. Rosen
    Kevin N. Sheth
    Nature Reviews Bioengineering, 2023, 1 (9): : 617 - 630
  • [35] The future combines high and low-field MRI
    Edjlali-Goujon, Myriam
    Loevblad, Karl-Olof
    JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2023, 50 (05) : 463 - 463
  • [36] Transverse low-field RF coils in MRI
    ClaasenVujcic, T
    Borsboom, HM
    Gaykema, HJG
    Mehlkopf, T
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1996, 36 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [37] BREAST COIL DESIGN FOR LOW-FIELD MRI
    KOMU, M
    KORMANO, M
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 27 (01) : 165 - 170
  • [38] Low-field MRI: An MR physics perspective
    Marques, Jose P.
    Simonis, Frank F. J.
    Webb, Andrew G.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (06) : 1528 - 1542
  • [39] Low-field MRI can be more sensitive than high-field MRI
    Coffey, Aaron M.
    Truong, Milton L.
    Chekmenev, Eduard Y.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2013, 237 : 169 - 174
  • [40] The deep route to low-field MRI with high potential
    Patricia M. Johnson
    Yvonne W. Lui
    Nature, 2023, 623 : 700 - 701