Transparency in internet regulation and governance: arguments and counter-arguments with some methodological reflections

被引：4

作者：

Stamile, Natalina ^{[1
,2
]}

Andresani, Gianluca ^{[3
,4
]}

机构：

[1] UFPR, Programa Posgrad Direito, Teoria Argumentacao Jurid, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

[2] Univ Bergamo, Filosofia & Informat Jurid, Bergamo, Italy

[3] Inst Appl Eth, Profess & Inst Eth Programme, Kingston Upon Hull, N Humberside, England

[4] Sch Law, Durham, England

来源：

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ESTUDOS POLITICOS | 2018年 / 117卷

关键词：

Argumentation Theory; Internet; Public Policy and Administration; Transparency; Politico-Legal; Theory; Regulation and Governance; Methodology;

D O I：

10.9732/P.0034-7191.2018V117P443

中图分类号：

D0 [政治学、政治理论];

学科分类号：

0302 ; 030201 ;

摘要：

The debate on the argumentative turn in Public Policy and Administration (PPA), as reflective of the influence of political-legal theory on the discipline, is reviewed with a thorough and indepth engagement with the Argumentation Theory (AT) literature. The focus in this article is in fact of a methodological nature, since we argue that critical scholars - who have contributed to the general and specialized (i.e. political discourse analysis and critical contextualism) literature of AT as well as politico-legal theory - pave the way to a novel methodology which will be exemplified through the analysis of the transparency concept.

引用

页码：443 / 476

页数：34