To evaluate and compare the results of over-underlay graft technique with conventional underlay myringoplasty

被引:10
作者
Panchal, Vineet [1 ]
Gulia, Joginder Singh [1 ]
Yadav, S. P. S. [1 ]
Hernot, Sharad [1 ]
Kathuria, Bhushan [1 ]
Kaintura, Madhuri [1 ]
机构
[1] Pt BD Sharma PGIMS, Dept Otolaryngol & Head & Neck Surg, Rohtak, Haryana, India
关键词
Chronic suppurative otitis media; Myringoplasty; Over-underlay; Underlay;
D O I
10.4103/0971-7749.164551
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of over-underlay graft technique of myringoplasty and compare the results of over-underlay graft technique with conventional underlay myringoplasty. Methods: In this prospective study, 40 patients of either sex in the age group of 15u50 years with noncholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media were recruited. The patients were initially managed medically to make the ear dry and after that they were operated upon. Twenty patients underwent conventional underlay myringoplasty and 20 patients underwent over-underlay myringoplasty. The follow-up period was 3 months. Results: Graft uptake and hearing improvement was comparable in both groups. Although the graft uptake was 5% lower in the group which underwent conventional underlay myringoplasty (90%) as compared to over-underlay myringoplasty (95%), however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.5). However, there was statistically significant difference in gain in hearing threshold (gain in A-B gap) in the conventional underlay myringoplasty (14.5 dB 7.236) as compared to over-underlay myringoplasty (18.75 dB 5.349) (P = 0.04). Conclusion: The over-underlay technique, which is a hybrid of both overlay and underlay technique, allows the advantages of both methods. It improves the graft uptake rate and hearing in subtotal and large perforations.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 279
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Ahmed Zafar, 2005, J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, V15, P768
[2]  
Aslam MA, 2009, PAK ARMED FORCES MED, P3
[3]  
FARRIOR JB, 1989, LARYNGOSCOPE, V99, P213
[4]  
Gopen Q., 2010, GLASSCOCK SHAMBAUGH, V6, P425
[5]   Over-under tympanoplasty [J].
Kartush, JM ;
Michaelides, EM ;
Becvarovski, Z ;
LaRouere, MJ .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (05) :802-807
[6]   Loop overlay tympanoplasty for anterior or subtotal perforations [J].
Lee, Heung-Yeup ;
Auo, Hyeon-Jin ;
Kang, Jun-Myung .
AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2010, 37 (02) :162-166
[7]   Functional Correlations of Tympanic Membrane Perforation Size [J].
Lerut, Bob ;
Pfammatter, Alain ;
Moons, Johnny ;
Linder, Thomas .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2012, 33 (03) :379-386
[8]   WHATS BEST IN MYRINGOPLASTY - UNDERLAY OR OVERLAY, DURA OR FASCIA [J].
PACKER, P ;
MACKENDRICK, A ;
SOLAR, M .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1982, 96 (01) :25-41
[9]   Functional results in myringoplasties [J].
Piedrola Maroto, David ;
Escalona Gutierrez, Juan Jose ;
Conde Jimenez, Manuel ;
Casado Morente, Juan Carlos ;
Povedano Rodriguez, Valerio ;
Benitez-Parejo, Nicolas .
ACTA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGICA ESPANOLA, 2010, 61 (02) :94-99
[10]   MYRINGOPLASTY [J].
SCHUKNECHT, HF .
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1976, 1 (01) :53-65