Writing Qualitative IS Literature Reviews - Guidelines for Synthesis, Interpretation, and Guidance of Research

被引:0
|
作者
Schryen, Guido [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Dept Business Informat Syst, D-93053 Regensburg, Germany
来源
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS | 2015年 / 37卷
关键词
Literature Review; Methodology; Tutorial; Literature Synthesis; Research Gaps; Research Agenda;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The literature review is an established research genre in many academic disciplines, including the IS discipline. Although many scholars agree that systematic literature reviews should be rigorous, few instructional texts for compiling a solid literature review, at least with regard to the IS discipline, exist. In response to this shortage, in this tutorial, I provide practical guidance for both students and researchers in the IS community who want to methodologically conduct qualitative literature reviews. The tutorial differs from other instructional texts in two regards. First, in contrast to most textbooks, I cover not only searching and synthesizing the literature but also the challenging tasks of framing the literature review, interpreting research findings, and proposing research paths. Second, I draw on other texts that provide guidelines for writing literature reviews in the IS discipline but use many examples of published literature reviews. I use an integrated example of a literature review, which guides the reader through the overall process of compiling a literature review.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 325
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Literature reviews of qualitative accounting research: challenges and opportunities
    Hiebl, Martin R. W.
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 20 (03) : 309 - 336
  • [2] Writing Literature Reviews: A Reprise and Update
    Callahan, Jamie L.
    HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2014, 13 (03) : 271 - 275
  • [3] An Instructional Approach for Improving the Writing of Literature Reviews
    Freer, Patrick K.
    Barker, Angela
    JOURNAL OF MUSIC TEACHER EDUCATION, 2008, 17 (02) : 69 - 82
  • [4] Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research
    Wu, Yuanyuan
    Ngai, Eric W. T.
    Wu, Pengkun
    Wu, Chong
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2020, 132
  • [5] Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: a literature review
    Walsh, D
    Downe, S
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2005, 50 (02) : 204 - 211
  • [6] Guidelines for conducting rapid reviews in psychology research
    Evan du Toit, Ryan
    de Klerk, Werner
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY IN AFRICA, 2022, 32 (06) : 640 - 647
  • [7] Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice
    Kraus, Sascha
    Breier, Matthias
    Lim, Weng Marc
    Dabic, Marina
    Kumar, Satish
    Kanbach, Dominik
    Mukherjee, Debmalya
    Corvello, Vincenzo
    Pineiro-Chousa, Juan
    Liguori, Eric
    Palacios-Marques, Daniel
    Schiavone, Francesco
    Ferraris, Alberto
    Fernandes, Cristina
    Ferreira, Joao J.
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 16 (08) : 2577 - 2595
  • [8] Searching the scientific literature: Implications for quantitative and qualitative reviews
    Wu, Yelena P.
    Aylward, Brandon S.
    Roberts, Michael C.
    Evans, Spencer C.
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2012, 32 (06) : 553 - 557
  • [9] Insight for Writing a Qualitative Research Paper
    Lee, Young-A
    FAMILY & CONSUMER SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2014, 43 (01) : 94 - 97
  • [10] Enhancing the impact of literature reviews: guidelines for making meaningful contributions
    van Riel, Allard
    Snyder, Hannah
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF MARKETING-ESIC, 2024, 28 (03) : 250 - 265