REGULATION OF THE FORMATION OF THE MAJOR DIETHYLSTILBESTROL DNA ADDUCT AND SOME EVIDENCE OF ITS STRUCTURE

被引:19
|
作者
BHAT, HK [1 ]
HAN, XL [1 ]
GLADEK, A [1 ]
LIEHR, JG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS, MED BRANCH, DEPT PHARMACOL & TOXICOL, GALVESTON, TX 77555 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/carcin/15.10.2137
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Diethylstilbestrol (DES) induces kidney tumors in hamsters, In previous studies, DES has been shown by P-32-postlabeling analysis to bind covalently to DNA in vivo and in vitro and DES-DNA adduct formation has been suggested to play a key role in DES-induced carcinogenicity. In this study, we have examined the influence of the dose of DES, age of animals and organ specificity on adduct formation in hamsters. In addition, we examined the characteristics of DES-DNA adduct formation in vitro and the structure of the major adduct. DES-DNA adducts were detected in liver and kidney of hamsters treated with at least 20 mg/kg DES. Adduct concentrations were higher at higher doses or in older compared to younger animals. The covalent binding of DES to DNA catalyzed by hamster liver microsomes required cumene hydroperoxide as cofactor, whereas with NADPH, adducts were barely detectable, presumably because the reactive metabolic intermediate DES quinone was reduced to DES. The major DES-DNA adduct formed in vitro was purified by semipreparative and analytical high pressure liquid chromatography. It is concluded that DES-DNA adducts are formed from DES quinone at very low rates in vitro and occur at low levels in vivo, even when hamsters receive very large doses of DES. The dependence of DES-DNA adduct concentrations in vitro on organic hydroperoxide cofactors required for cytochrome P450-mediated DES quinone formation indicates that stilbene-DNA adduction may occur only under conditions of oxidative stress.
引用
收藏
页码:2137 / 2142
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DNA adduct formation by ochratoxin A: Review of the available evidence
    Mally, A
    Dekant, W
    FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS PART A-CHEMISTRY ANALYSIS CONTROL EXPOSURE & RISK ASSESSMENT, 2005, 22 : 65 - 74
  • [2] ROLE OF METABOLISM AND DNA ADDUCT FORMATION IN THE INDUCTION OF SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGES IN HUMAN-LYMPHOCYTES BY DIETHYLSTILBESTROL
    LUNDGREN, K
    RANDERATH, K
    EVERSON, RB
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1988, 48 (02) : 335 - 338
  • [3] Mechanism of metabolic activation and DNA adduct formation by the human carcinogen diethylstilbestrol: The defining link to natural estrogens
    Saeed, Muhammad
    Rogan, Eleanor
    Cavalieri, Ercole
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 124 (06) : 1276 - 1284
  • [4] Modulation of adult rat benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) metabolism and DNA adduct formation by neonatal diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure
    Ramesh, A
    Inyang, F
    Knuckles, ME
    EXPERIMENTAL AND TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2004, 56 (03) : 129 - 138
  • [5] Adduct formation of steroids in APCl and its relation to structure identification
    Honing, M
    van Bockxmeer, E
    Beekman, D
    ANALUSIS, 2000, 28 (10) : 921 - 924
  • [6] Consequences of quercetin methylation for its covalent glutathione and DNA adduct formation
    van der Woude, H
    Boersma, MG
    Alink, GM
    Vervoort, J
    Rietjens, IMCM
    CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 2006, 160 (03) : 193 - 203
  • [7] DNA ADDUCT FORMATION IN MICE FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH USED ENGINE OIL AND IDENTIFICATION OF SOME OF THE MAJOR ADDUCTS BY P-32 POSTLABELING
    CARMICHAEL, PL
    SHE, MN
    HEWER, A
    JACOB, J
    GRIMMER, G
    PHILLIPS, DH
    CANCER LETTERS, 1992, 64 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [8] Evidence for the DNA binding and adduct formation of estrone and 17β-estradiol after dimethyldioxirane activation
    Yu, FL
    Wang, MY
    Li, DH
    Bender, W
    Zheng, WY
    CHEMICO-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, 1998, 110 (03) : 173 - 187
  • [10] Cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in rat spermatozoa and its effect on fetal development
    Hooser, SB
    van Dijk-Knijnenburg, WCM
    Waalkens-Berendsen, IDH
    Smits-van Prooije, AE
    Snoeij, NJ
    Baan, RA
    Fichtinger-Schepman, AMJ
    CANCER LETTERS, 2000, 151 (01) : 71 - 80