Comparison of Birth Outcomes by Gestational Diabetes Screening Criteria

被引:13
作者
Davis, Esa M. [1 ]
Scifres, Christina M. [2 ]
Abebe, Kaleab [1 ]
Costacou, Tina [3 ]
Comer, Diane [1 ]
Catalano, Patrick [4 ]
Simhan, Hyagriv [5 ]
Freiberg, Matthew [6 ]
Day, Nancy [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Med, 230 McKee Pl,Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Med, Nashville, TN USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
来源
AJP REPORTS | 2018年 / 8卷 / 04期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
screening strategies; gestational diabetes; fetal growth; pregnancy outcomes;
D O I
10.1055/s-0038-1675343
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objectives This study is to examine the association between different diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse birth outcomes. Study Design A retrospective cohort study of 5,937 women with a singleton pregnancy was conducted, who completed GDM screening between 24 to 32 weeks gestational age. Four nonoverlapping groups of women defined as: 1) Normal: glucose challenge test (GCT) < 130 mg/dL, 2) elevated GCT thorn normal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT): abnormal 1 hour GCT thorn normal 3 hour OGTT, 3) GDM/International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG): abnormal 3 hour OGTT by the IADPSG criteria, and 4) GDM/Carpenter-Coustan (CC): diagnosis per CC criteria. We used logistic regression to examine the association between GDM group classification and main outcome of macrosomia and secondary birth outcomes. Results Prevalences were GDM/CC 4.6%, GDM/IADPSG 3.0, and 7.6% overall. GDM/ IADPSG group was associated with increasedmacrosomia (adj OR [odd ratio] 1.87; 95% CI [confidence interval]: 1.08-3.25; p = 0.02), while GDM/CC group was associated with increased preterm birth (adj OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.05-2.80; p <1/4> 0.03). Conclusion Little difference in birth outcomes was found between the twocriteria, GDM/ CC and GDM/IADPSG. Randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the risks and benefits of these screening paradigms before their incorporation into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:E280 / E288
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A United States national reference for fetal growth [J].
Alexander, GR ;
Himes, JH ;
Kaufman, RB ;
Mor, J ;
Kogan, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) :163-168
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, DIABETES CARE, V35, pS11, DOI [10.2337/dc12-s004, 10.2337/dc35-S011, 10.2337/dc12-s011]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OBSTET GYNECOL, V131, P406
[4]   Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes [J].
Crowther, CA ;
Hiller, JE ;
Moss, JR ;
McPhee, AJ ;
Jeffries, WS ;
Robinson, JS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (24) :2477-2486
[5]   Introduction of IADPSG Criteria for the Screening and Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Results in Improved Pregnancy Outcomes at a Lower Cost in a Large Cohort of Pregnant Women: The St. Carlos Gestational Diabetes Study [J].
Duran, Alejandra ;
Saenz, Sofia ;
Torrejon, Maria J. ;
Bordiu, Elena ;
del Valle, Laura ;
Galindo, Mercedes ;
Perez, Noelia ;
Herraiz, Miguel A. ;
Izquierdo, Nuria ;
Rubio, Miguel A. ;
Runkle, Isabelle ;
Perez-Ferre, Natalia ;
Cusihuallpa, Idalia ;
Jimenez, Sandra ;
Garcia de la Torre, Nuria ;
Fernandez, Maria D. ;
Montanez, Carmen ;
Familiar, Cristina ;
Calle-Pascual, Alfonso L. .
DIABETES CARE, 2014, 37 (09) :2442-2450
[6]   Perinatal Outcomes Associated With the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Made by The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Criteria [J].
Ethridge, John K., Jr. ;
Catalano, Patrick M. ;
Waters, Thaddeus P. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 124 (03) :571-578
[7]   Gestational Diabetes Screening The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Compared With Carpenter-Coustan Screening [J].
Feldman, R. Klara ;
Tieu, Ryan S. ;
Yasumura, Lyn .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 (01) :10-17
[8]  
Knowler WC, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V346, P393, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa012512
[9]   The Relationship Between Maternal Glycemia and Perinatal Outcome [J].
Landon, Mark B. ;
Mele, Lisa ;
Spong, Catherine Y. ;
Carpenter, Marshall W. ;
Ramin, Susan M. ;
Casey, Brian ;
Wapner, Ronald J. ;
Varner, Michael W. ;
Rouse, Dwight J. ;
Thorp, John M., Jr. ;
Sciscione, Anthony ;
Catalano, Patrick ;
Harper, Margaret ;
Saade, George ;
Caritis, Steve N. ;
Sorokin, Yoram ;
Peaceman, Alan M. ;
Tolosa, Jorge E. ;
Anderson, Garland D. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 117 (02) :218-224
[10]   A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes. [J].
Landon, Mark B. ;
Spong, Catherine Y. ;
Thom, Elizabeth ;
Carpenter, Marshall W. ;
Ramin, Susan M. ;
Casey, Brian ;
Wapner, Ronald J. ;
Varner, Michael W. ;
Rouse, Dwight J. ;
Thorp, John M., Jr. ;
Sciscione, Anthony ;
Catalano, Patrick ;
Harper, Margaret ;
Saade, George ;
Lain, Kristine Y. ;
Sorokin, Yoram ;
Peaceman, Alan M. ;
Tolosa, Jorge E. ;
Anderson, Garland B. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2009, 361 (14) :1339-1348