The visible image of a God who may be Michel Henry and Richard Kearney in dialogue

被引:0
作者
Ford, Jonah [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Theol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
来源
AISTHEMA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL | 2015年 / 2卷 / 02期
关键词
Phenomenology; Exegesis; Michel Henry; Richard Kearney; Edmund Husserl; Exodus 3:14;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This article attempts an exploration of Michel Henry's I Am the Truth and Richard Kearney's The God Who May Be, as each appropriate the Husserlian critique of Kantian epistemology. Although Henry and Kearney both develop a Christian theology rooted in this Husserlian inheritance, their explication of the truths Christianity asserts is strikingly different. It is the assertion of this essay that this difference is primarily a textual one; or, to put it another way, it is conditioned first by their scriptural gaze.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Henry Come, 2003, ESSENCE MANIFESTATIO, P502
  • [2] HENRy Michel, 1996, CEST MOI VERITE PHIL
  • [3] Husserl E., 1973, HUSSERLIANA, V13
  • [4] HUSSERL E., 2008, PROBLEMI FONDAMENTAI, P1
  • [5] HUSSERL E., 1966, PHANOMENOLOGIE INNER, VX, P33
  • [6] KANT I., 2004, CRITICA RAGION PURA
  • [7] Kearney Richard., 2001, GOD WHO MAY BE HERME