On congruence between brand and human personalities

被引:49
作者
Maehle, Natalia [1 ]
Shneor, Rotem [2 ]
机构
[1] Nofima Market, Mkt Brand Management & Consumer Behav, Tromso, Norway
[2] Univ Agder, Int Mkt & Strategy, Kristiansand, Norway
关键词
Brand identity; Human nature; Personality; Brand loyalty;
D O I
10.1108/10610421011018383
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this research paper is to uncover the relations between brand and human personality by identifying brand preferences of consumers with different personality types. Design/methodology/approach - Based on the existing literature, 15 propositions are suggested linking Ekelund's DI types as parsimonious proxies of human personality and brand personality dimensions as suggested by Aaker. Propositions were tested through statistical analysis of survey data collected in two stages. Findings - It was found that consumers prefer brands with personalities that match their own. For example, consumers with Blue DI type exhibit clear aversion from the excitement dimension of brand personality, whereas consumers with Red DI type exhibit clear preference for the sincerity dimension of brand personality. No clear findings emerged concerning the Green DI type, mostly likely linked to the individualistic, non-conformist and innovative orientations of such individuals. In addition data revealed a possible hierarchy of brand personality dimensions' influence. Practical implications - Findings provide guidelines for better tailoring of promotional materials based on target customer groups, as well as the ability to evaluate underperforming brands in terms of a brand-human personality mismatch. Originality/value - The paper fills a gap in the literature about the congruence between brand and human personalities, and demonstrates how brand personality dimensions impacts brand preference among different consumer types.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Dimensions of brand personality [J].
Aaker, JL .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1997, 34 (03) :347-356
[2]  
Adizes K. I., 2004, MANAGEMENT MISMANAGE
[3]  
Adizes K. I., 1976, CALIFORNIA MANAGEMEN, V19, P5
[4]  
Belbin M., 1981, MANAGEMENT TEAMS WHY
[5]  
Belbin M., 2000, BEYOND THE TEAM
[6]   POSSESSIONS AND THE EXTENDED SELF [J].
BELK, RW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1988, 15 (02) :139-168
[7]  
Briggs I. M., 1985, MANUAL GUIDE DEV USE
[8]  
Carver C., 2004, PERSPECTIVES PERSONA
[9]   The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters [J].
Cattell, RB .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1943, 38 (04) :476-506
[10]   CONGRUENCE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SELF IMAGES AND PRODUCT BRANDS [J].
DOLICH, IJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1969, 6 (01) :80-84