Political PR in the 2005 UK General Election: Winning and Losing, With a Little Help From Spin

被引:2
作者
Brissenden, John [1 ]
Moloney, Kevin [1 ]
机构
[1] Bournemouth Univ, Publ Relat & Corp Commun, Poole, Dorset, England
关键词
Political PR; presentational trellis; 'spin'; voter disengagement; process journalism; emails; press conference; event management; stunts; lobbying; election campaign;
D O I
10.1362/026725705775194175
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The public relations of the UK general election of 2005 is examined in the light of the active promotional culture of British politics, a culture that is especially active at election time. The PR or 'spin' can be seen as a presentational trellis offering to voters, mostly via the media, glimpses of policies and politicians which are favourable to the originating party. The purpose of the trellis for the parties is to maximise their electoral advantage and to minimise their disadvantage. The major obstacle to their success is the capacity of the media to brush aside the trellis and to report on the 'other side'. Whatever the benefits and costs for democracy of this tension between partisan presentation and journalism, there is little evidence that voter disengagement with electoral politics is caused by these public relations shows. Political PR is part of the UK's promotional culture; voter disengagement relates to other systemic and more causal features of contemporary British society. A small purposive (but unrepresentative) survey of campaign observers showed key features of political PR servicing the fundamentals of party, policy and personality.
引用
收藏
页码:1005 / 1020
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Bromley C., 2004, J PUBLIC AFFAIRS, V4, P328
  • [2] Electoral Commission, 2005, VOT 2005 REV SOC AC
  • [3] Spin doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany - Metacommunication about media manipulation
    Esser, F
    Reinemann, C
    Fan, D
    [J]. HARVARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS, 2001, 6 (01): : 16 - 45
  • [4] Gaber I., 2004, J PUBLIC AFFAIRS, V4, P365, DOI DOI 10.1002/PA.199
  • [5] McNair B., 2004, JOURNALISM STUD, V5, P325
  • [6] Meyer Thomas, 2002, MEDIA DEMOCRACY MEDI
  • [7] Mill J.S., 1859, UTILITARIANISM
  • [8] Mill John Stuart, 1978, LIBERTY
  • [9] The rise of the PR industry in Britain, 1979-98
    Miller, D
    Dinan, W
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2000, 15 (01) : 5 - 35
  • [10] Miller D., 2004, J PUBLIC AFF, V4, P374