Validation of a New Skinfold Prediction Equation Based on Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

被引:2
作者
Ball, Stephen [1 ]
Cowan, Celsi [1 ]
Thyfault, John [1 ]
LaFontaine, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Nutr & Exercise Physiol, 315 Gwynn Hall, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
body composition; percent body fat; dual energy x-ray absorptiometry;
D O I
10.1080/1091367X.2014.914518
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Skinfold prediction equations recommended by the American College of Sports Medicine underestimate body fat percentage. The purpose of this research was to validate an alternative equation for men created from dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Two hundred ninety-seven males, aged 18-65, completed a skinfold assessment and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan to determine percent of body fat. Three American College of Sports Medicine equations (JP7, JP3a, and JP3b) and the new dual energy x-ray absorptiometry criterion equation were used to predict percent of body fat. Mean age was 32.4 +/- 14.0 years and mean BMI was 25.6 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2). The mean dual energy x-ray absorptiometry percent of body fat was 18.0 +/- 5.9. The mean percent of body fat for Dual Energy X-Ray Aborptiometry (DC), JP7, JP3a, and JP3b were 19.1 +/- 6.3, 16.1 +/- 7.4, 14.8 +/- 6.8, 15.6 +/- 6.7, respectively. The standard error of the estimate of DC was low (2.72%) and was highly correlated (R-2 = 0.87) with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. The DC equation more accurately predicted percent of body fat across a general population of men than the recommended American College of Sports Medicine equations.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 208
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Comparison of anthropometry to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: A new prediction equation for women [J].
Ball, S ;
Swan, PD ;
DeSimone, R .
RESEARCH QUARTERLY FOR EXERCISE AND SPORT, 2004, 75 (03) :248-258
[2]   Comparison of anthropometry to DXA: a new prediction equation for men [J].
Ball, SD ;
Altena, TS ;
Swan, PD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2004, 58 (11) :1525-1531
[3]  
BEHNKE A, 1942, THE JOURNAL OF THE A, V118, P495
[4]  
Bellanger TM, 2005, J LA STATE MED SOC, V157, P49
[5]  
Bellanger Tracie Manuel, 2005, J La State Med Soc, V157 Spec No 1, pS42
[6]   INTERSITE COMPARISON OF THE HOLOGIC QDR-1000 DUAL ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
TONG, CM ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1991, 64 (761) :440-446
[7]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[8]   DENSITOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BODY COMPOSITION REVISION OF SOME QUANTIATIVE ASSUMPTIONS [J].
BROZEK, J ;
ANDERSON, JT ;
KEYS, A ;
GRANDE, F .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 1963, 110 (01) :113-&
[9]   Body-mass index and mortality in a prospective cohort of US adults [J].
Calle, EE ;
Thun, MJ ;
Petrelli, JM ;
Rodriguez, C ;
Heath, CW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (15) :1097-1105
[10]  
CLARK RR, 1993, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V25, P528