Insulin Glargine versus Insulin Detemir: Glycemic Control and Insulin Dose in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients Using a Medical Record Linkage System in the Netherlands

被引:1
作者
Eland, Ingo A. [1 ]
Heintjes, Edith M. [2 ]
Houweling, Leanne [2 ]
degrooth, Ricardo [3 ]
Veneman, Thiemo F. [4 ]
Bouter, K. Paul [5 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Internal Med, POB 2500, NL-3430 EM Nietiwegein, Netherlands
[2] PHARMO Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Sanofi Aventis Netherlands BV, Gouda, Netherlands
[4] ZGT Henget, Dept Internal Med, Hengelo, Netherlands
[5] Jeroen Bosch Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Den Bosch, Netherlands
关键词
Insulin detemir; Insulin glargine; Type; 2; diabetes; Glycemic control; Insulin dose; The Netherlands;
D O I
10.4172/2155-6156.1000165
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In randomized controlled trials, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus required higher doses of insulin detemir than insulin glargine to obtain the same glycemic control. However, this may differ in daily clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a cohort study to compare glycemic control, daily basal insulin dose and persistence in The Netherlands. Data were obtained from the PHARMO record linkage system. Patients starting glargine or detemir in 2004 through 2007 were included if they had a follow-up and history of at least 1 year, including glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) measurements. Glycemic control and insulin dose were compared within 1 year after start of treatment. Average insulin dose was calculated based on the amount of insulin dispensed over time. Results: A total of 708 patients on glargine and 298 on detemir were included. Patients starting glargine had less often used insulin in the previous year (19 versus 31%, P<0.001) and less often used oral antihyperglycemic drugs concomitantly (61 versus 67%, P<0.05) than those starting detemir. Despite a higher mean HbA(1c) at baseline in patients who started glargine (8.6% versus 8.4%), the change from baseline in HbA(1c) at follow-up was greater with glargine (-0.9%) than with detemir (-0.4%, P<0.001). The proportion of patients with HbA(1c) < 7% was similar between the two cohorts. Mean insulin dose at follow-up was significantly lower with glargine than with detemir (31.3 IU versus 36.6 IU, P<0.01). Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were treated with insulin glargine achieved better glycemic control with lower insulin doses than did patients who were treated with insulin detemir.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of one-year costs of Type 2 diabetes treatment with insulin glargine or insulin detemir in a basal supported oral therapy (BOT) in Germany
    Pscherer, S.
    Dietrich, E. S.
    Dippel, F. -W.
    Neilson, A. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 48 (02) : 129 - 137
  • [42] Exenatide versus insulin glargine: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in patients with Type 2 diabetes in Switzerland
    Braendle, M.
    Erny-Albrecht, K. M.
    Goodall, G.
    Spinas, G. A.
    Streit, P.
    Valentine, W. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 47 (08) : 501 - 515
  • [43] Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine U100 in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Serbia
    Lalic, Nebojsa
    Russel-Szymczyk, Monika
    Culic, Marina
    Tikkanen, Christian Klyver
    Chubb, Barrie
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2018, 9 (03) : 1201 - 1216
  • [44] Insulin degludec is associated with less frequent and milder hypoglycemia in insulin-deficient patients with type 1 diabetes compared with insulin glargine or detemir
    Iwasaki S.
    Kozawa J.
    Kimura T.
    Fukui K.
    Iwahashi H.
    Imagawa A.
    Shimomura I.
    Diabetology International, 2017, 8 (2) : 228 - 236
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Marc Evans
    Barrie Chubb
    Jens Gundgaard
    Diabetes Therapy, 2017, 8 : 275 - 291
  • [46] The cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide versus insulin glargine for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan
    Ishii, Hitoshi
    Madin-Warburton, Matthew
    Strizek, Alena
    Thornton-Jones, Lucy
    Suzuki, Shuichi
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 21 (05) : 488 - 496
  • [47] Cost-Effectiveness of Biphasic Insulin Aspart versus Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China
    Palmer, James L.
    Beaudet, Amelie
    White, Jeremy
    Plun-Favreau, Juliette
    Smith-Palmer, Jayne
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2010, 27 (11) : 814 - 827
  • [48] Effectiveness of insulin glargine U-300 versus insulin glargine U-100 on nocturnal hypoglycemia and glycemic control in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Diez-Fernandez, Ana
    Cavero-Redondo, Ivan
    Moreno-Fernandez, Jesus
    Pozuelo-Carrascosa, Diana P.
    Garrido-Miguel, Miriam
    Martinez-Vizcaino, Vicente
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2019, 56 (03) : 355 - 364
  • [49] Cost-effectiveness of Insulin Degludec Versus Insulin Glargine in Adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Evans, Marc
    Chubb, Barrie
    Gundgaard, Jens
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2017, 8 (02) : 275 - 291
  • [50] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy and safety outcomes of insulin glargine with NPH insulin, premixed insulin preparations or with insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes mellitus
    Rys, Przemyslaw
    Wojciechowski, Piotr
    Rogoz-Sitek, Agnieszka
    Niesyczynski, Grzegorz
    Lis, Joanna
    Syta, Albert
    Malecki, Maciej T.
    ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2015, 52 (04) : 649 - 662