THE ANALYSIS OF MULTIMODAL DISCOURSE: A COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGICAL PROPOSALS

被引:12
作者
Carcamo Morales, Benjamin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile
[2] Conicyt, Santiago, Chile
来源
FORMA Y FUNCION | 2018年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
discourse analysis; multimodal phenomena; intersemiosis; methodology; multimodality;
D O I
10.15446/fyf.v31n2.74660
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The article compares some of the most relevant proposals for multimodal analysis, in order to describe them and establish contrasts regarding the implementation of their assumptions. More specifically, this theoretical revision shows both convergences and differences among the multi-semiotic artifact proposal, the compositional approach, the socio-semiotic theory of multimodality, and the multimodal metaphor. The results of the comparative analysis make it possible to understand the logic behind multimodal discourse and the diverse paths that researchers interested in this field can follow. Furthermore, these findings contribute a more detailed view of the ways in which the analysis of modal discourse has been implemented in the discipline's empirical studies.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 174
页数:30
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Barthes R., 1977, IMAGE MUSIC TEXT, P32
[2]  
Bateman J.A., 2014, PRAGMATICS DISCOURSE, P145
[3]  
Bezemer J., 2010, DESIGNS LEARN, V3, P10, DOI DOI 10.16993/DFL.26
[4]  
Bezemer J., 2012, NCRM WORKING PAPER, V1, P1
[5]  
Bezemer J., 2016, INTRO MULTIMODALITY, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315638027
[6]  
Bezemer J, 2014, AUST J LANG LIT, V37, P77
[7]  
Boudon E., 2014, ESTUDIOS LINGUISTICA, V47, P164
[8]  
Forceville C, 2009, APPL COGN LINGUIST, V11, P3
[9]  
Forceville C, 2009, APPL COGN LINGUIST, V11, P19
[10]  
Forceville C, 2008, CAMB HANDB PSYCHOL, P462