The BRIC Nations and the Anatomy of Economic Development: The Core Tenets of Rule of Law

被引:2
作者
Ramanujam, Nandini [2 ]
Caivano, Nicholas [1 ]
机构
[1] Amnesty Int, London, England
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Law, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
rule of law; economic development; BRIC; institutions; growth;
D O I
10.1515/ldr-2016-0013
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The past decade has witnessed a revival in interest in the relationship between rule of law and economic development. Disenchantment with the universal model that emerged from the Washington Consensus era led to a shift in focus to a more pluralist approach in which policy prescriptions became tailored to each country's socio-political context. The authors suggest that the pendulum may have swung to the other extreme, and that the newly ascendant pluralist approach may overemphasize pluralism at the expense of core rule of law principles. This paper examines the rule of law building efforts pursued by the BRIC countries to shed light on their strikingly different processes of economic transition. The authors argue that formal, informal, and transitional institutions have played distinct roles in these divergent economic development narratives. While informal and transitional institutions have facilitated growth during initial and intermediate phases of development, a degree of formalization across some institutions is critical to support the long-term development of a market economy. The authors set out the core tenets approach, an exploratory concept that emphasizes a malleable set of fundamental rule of law principles which exist alongside transition institutions to build trust in formal institutions as an economy advances.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 320
页数:52
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Acemoglu D., Robinson J., Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, (2012)
[2]  
Aidis R., Estrin S., Institutions, Networks and Entrepreneurship Development in Russia: An Exploration, IZA Discussion Paper No. 2161, (2006)
[3]  
Bardhan P.K., Awakening Giants, Feet of Clay: Assessing the Economic Rise of China and India, (2010)
[4]  
Black B.S., Et al., Russian privatization and corporate governance: What went wrong?, Stanford Law Review, 52, 6, (2000)
[5]  
Goldman's BRIC Era Ends As Fund Folds after Years of Losses
[6]  
Bolotinsky M., Jiang H., SMEs in Russia and China: A Comparison
[7]  
Bosworth B., Et al., Sources of Growth in the Indian Economy, NBER Working Paper No 12901, (2007)
[8]  
Brashear Tiede L., Judicial independence: Often cited, rarely understood, Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 15, 1, (2006)
[9]  
Brett J.M., Et al., New approaches to the study of culture in industrial/organizational psychology, New Perspectives on International Industrial/Organizational Psychology, (1997)
[10]  
Buiter W., Renbari E., Global growth generators: Moving beyond emerging markets and brics, CEPR Policy Insight, 55, (2011)