The Effect of Culture on the Academic Honesty of Marketing and Business Students

被引:33
作者
Payan, Janice [1 ]
Reardon, James [1 ]
McCorkle, Denny [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO 80639 USA
关键词
ethics; cheating; academic honesty; culture; pedagogy;
D O I
10.1177/0273475310377781
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Two trends in marketing higher education include (a) growing opportunities for intercultural encounters in the classroom and (b) a growing concern about student academic honesty. Research regarding the relationship between specific cultural measures and academic honesty is sparse in the context of marketing and business programs in higher education. This study surveys marketing and business college students from 13 different countries about their perceptions of questionable behaviors concerning academic honesty and measures Hofstede's commonly studied cultural dimension of individualism/ collectivism as a direct test of the cultural hypotheses presented. As predicted, collectivist business students are more tolerant than individualist business students concerning questionable academic behaviors that are unilateral (e.g., copying material/ papers from the Internet or looking at another student's exam without the knowledge of the other student), collaborative (e.g., getting exam questions/answers from others or free riding in a group), and delaying (e.g., requesting due date/exam date delays or assignment extensions with false information). In alignment with the theory of reasoned action, results also show that a positive attitude about the value of teamwork (relative to individual work) mediates the effect between collectivism and questionable academic behaviors that are collaborative. The results and recommendations are particularly relevant to marketing educators teaching beginners to advanced courses in a culturally diverse classroom.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 291
页数:17
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Abernathy AM., 2005, MARKETING ED REV, V15, P47, DOI [10.1080/10528008.2005.11488891, DOI 10.1080/10528008.2005.11488891]
[2]  
Ajzen I, 2005, HANDBOOK OF ATTITUDES, P173
[3]  
Al-Khadash, 2008, J ACCOUNTING BUSINES, V15, P109
[4]  
Allen J., 1998, J MARKET EDUC, V20, P41, DOI DOI 10.1177/027347539802000106
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, J EDUC BUS, DOI DOI 10.1080/08832320009599020
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2003, INT J ADVERT, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00067-7, DOI 10.1080/02650487.2003.11072848]
[7]  
Arnold D. F., 1999, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V18, P45, DOI DOI 10.2308/AUD.1999.18.SUPPLEMENT.45
[9]   PREDICTING DISHONEST ACTIONS USING THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
BECK, L ;
AJZEN, I .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1991, 25 (03) :285-301
[10]   Modeling academic dishonesty: The role of student perceptions and misconduct type [J].
Bisping, Timothy O. ;
Patron, Hilde ;
Roskelley, Kenneth .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION, 2008, 39 (01) :4-21