Evaluation of MRI Versus Arthroscopy in Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscal Injuries

被引:13
作者
Bari, Amreen Abdul [1 ]
Kashikar, Shivali Vaibhav [1 ]
Lakhkar, Bhushan Narayan [1 ]
Ahsan, Mohammad Saleem [2 ]
机构
[1] DMIMS, JNMC, Dept Radiodiag, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
[2] DMIMS, JNMC, Dept Anaesthesia, Wardha, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament; Arthroscopy; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.7860/JCDR/2014/10980.5331
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims and Objectives: To find out the incidence of ACL & meniscal injuries, to co-relate MRI findings with arthroscopy by calculating Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive And Negative Predictive Values (PPV & NPV) keeping arthroscopy as a gold standard, to find out the degree of subluxation and to grade it and to find a threshold value of fluid in knee. Settings and Design: Prospective analytical study. Materials and Methods: MRI of 230 patients with 71 arthroscopic co-relation in year 2012-14 was analysed. Statistical Analysis: Descriptive statistics using Chi square test and predictive values was done. The spearman correlation coefficient was done by using statistical software SPSS 17.0. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was calculated (in %). For ACL it was 87.87, 81.57, 80.55, 88.57 for MM 93.54, 87.50, 85.29, 94.59 and for LM 77.77, 81.81, 72.41, 85.71 respectively. We found 35.6% incidence of anterior tibial subluxation with maximum patients having grade 1 category subluxation. Two hundred and one cases showed joint fluid in lateral aspect of the suprapatellar pouch (AP diameter > 10mm) with internal derangement. Conclusion: MRI is helpful in diagnosing meniscal and cruciate ligament injuries. Arthroscopy still remains gold standard for definitive diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:RC14 / RC18
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Objective Criteria for Return to Athletics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Subsequent Reinjury Rates: A Systematic Review [J].
Barber-Westin, Sue D. ;
Noyes, Frank R. .
PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 2011, 39 (03) :100-110
[2]   Accuracy of routine magnetic resonance imaging in meniscal and ligamentous injuries of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy [J].
Behairy, Noha H. ;
Dorgham, Mohsen A. ;
Khaled, Sherif A. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (04) :961-967
[3]   Potential cost savings of MR imaging obtained before arthroscopy of the knee: Evaluation of 50 consecutive patients [J].
BuiMansfield, LT ;
Youngberg, RA ;
Warme, W ;
Pitcher, JD ;
Nguyen, PLL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (04) :913-918
[4]   MR DIAGNOSIS OF COMPLETE TEARS OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT OF THE KNEE - IMPORTANCE OF ANTERIOR SUBLUXATION OF THE TIBIA [J].
CHAN, WP ;
PETERFY, C ;
FRITZ, RC ;
GENANT, HK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (02) :355-360
[5]   Magnetic resonance imaging versus arthroscopy in the diagnosis of knee pathology, concentrating on meniscal lesions and ACL tears: a systematic review [J].
Crawford, Ruth ;
Walley, Gayle ;
Bridgman, Stephen ;
Maffulli, Nicola .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 84 :5-23
[6]   MR DIAGNOSIS OF MENISCAL TEARS - ANALYSIS OF CAUSES OF ERRORS [J].
DESMET, AA ;
TUITE, MJ ;
NORRIS, MA ;
SWAN, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 163 (06) :1419-1423
[7]  
Esmaili Jah Ali Akbar, 2005, Acta Orthop Belg, V71, P189
[8]  
Madhusudhan T, 2008, J ORTHOP SURG RES, V3, P19, DOI DOI 10.1186/1749-799X-3-19
[9]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING AS A TOOL FOR EVALUATION OF TRAUMATIC KNEE INJURIES - ANATOMICAL AND PATHOANATOMICAL CORRELATIONS [J].
MANDELBAUM, BR ;
FINERMAN, GAM ;
REICHER, MA ;
HARTZMAN, S ;
BASSETT, LW ;
GOLD, RH ;
RAUSCHNING, W ;
DOREY, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1986, 14 (05) :361-370
[10]   Diagnosis of ACL and meniscal injuries: MR imaging of knee flexion versus extension compared to arthroscopy [J].
Muhle, Claus ;
Ahn, Joong Mo ;
Dieke, Constanze .
SPRINGERPLUS, 2013, 2 :1-10