Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs and Jump-Diffusion Asset Dynamics II: Economic Implications

被引:1
作者
Czerwonko, Michal [1 ]
Perrakis, Stylianos [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, 1450 Rue Guy, Montreal, PQ H3H 0A1, Canada
关键词
Transaction costs; portfolio selection; jump diffusion; asset allocation; finite horizon;
D O I
10.1142/S2010139216500191
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We derive allocation rules under isoelastic utility for a mixed jump-diffusion process in a two-asset portfolio selection problem with finite horizon in the presence of proportional transaction costs; we allow cash dividends on the risky asset. The allocation shifts toward the riskless asset relative to diffusion in varying degrees depending on parameter values. It is sensitive to the proportion of the jump component to total volatility, but also to the expected amplitude for a given proportion. The shift becomes small when the relative risk aversion increases, but it becomes major when the solvency constraint is active in the presence of jumps. We derive utility losses and risk premia due to jumps under realistic parameter values, and show that even when the no transaction region is very similar between pure diffusion and the mixed process the latter corresponds to lower utility because of higher portfolio restructuring costs.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Nonparametric risk management and implied risk aversion [J].
Aït-Sahalia, Y ;
Lo, AW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2000, 94 (1-2) :9-51
[2]   Disentangling diffusion from jumps [J].
Aït-Sahalia, Y .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 74 (03) :487-528
[3]   An empirical investigation of continuous-time equity return models [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Benzoni, L ;
Lund, J .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (03) :1239-1284
[4]   Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Diebold, Francis X. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (04) :701-720
[5]   Empirical performance of alternative option pricing models [J].
Bakshi, G ;
Cao, C ;
Chen, ZW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (05) :2003-2049
[6]  
Barndorff-Nielsen O. E., 2006, J FINANC ECONOMET, V4, P1, DOI DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBI022
[7]   Rare Disasters, Asset Prices, and Welfare Costs [J].
Barro, Robert J. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2009, 99 (01) :243-264
[8]   Maximum likelihood estimation of latent affine processes [J].
Bates, David S. .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2006, 19 (03) :909-965
[9]   THE CRASH OF 87 - WAS IT EXPECTED - THE EVIDENCE FROM OPTIONS MARKETS [J].
BATES, DS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1991, 46 (03) :1009-1044
[10]   Option-implied risk aversion estimates [J].
Bliss, RR ;
Panigirtzoglou, N .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (01) :407-446