BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS - DIFFERENCES RELATED TO PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY

被引:7
作者
MARTIN, F
DELPONT, E
SUISSE, G
DOLISI, C
机构
[1] Laboratoire d'Explorations/, Fonctionnelles du Systeme Nerveux, Hopital Pasteur, BP 069-06002 Nice Cedex
关键词
BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS; GENDER; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1021204
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Shorter sensory-motor reaction times have been reported in athletes compared with sedentary subjects. Previous results have shown significantly shorter visual evoked potentials (VEPs) latencies in a group of tennis players, but there was no difference between a group of rowers and control subjects. In the present study, the same groups were investigated in order to establish whether similar differences could be found in relation to brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs). Waves I to V latencies (Ls), interpeak latencies (IPLs) and wave amplitudes were measured. The results showed great differences related to gender. The I-III IPL was shorter in the females than in the males. Differences were also found in relation to physical activity. The most important feature was the significantly shorter III-V LPL observed in the rowers and in the tennis players of both genders compared with sedentary control subjects. In the males these differences were linked to training factors. Therefore, unlike VEPs which seemed to be linked to sports requiring high visual acuity, BAEPs seemed to be linked more widely to top-class physical activity and not to specific sensory aptitude. It was hypothesized that the shorter III-V IPL might be due to shorter synaptic transmission time in the superior olivary complex.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] ABT K, 1987, METHOD INFORM MED, V26, P77
  • [2] BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY, PATTERN-REVERSAL VISUAL, AND SHORT-LATENCY SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS - LATENCIES IN RELATION TO AGE, SEX, AND BRAIN AND BODY SIZE
    ALLISON, T
    WOOD, CC
    GOFF, WR
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 55 (06): : 619 - 636
  • [3] BARBARA NK, 1961, RES QUART, V32, P409
  • [4] Beagley H A, 1978, Br J Audiol, V12, P69, DOI 10.3109/03005367809078858
  • [5] BHANOT JL, 1980, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V20, P113
  • [6] BHANOT JL, 1979, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V19, P199
  • [7] CHIAPPA KH, 1990, EVOKED POTENTIALS CL, P224
  • [8] CHIAPPA KH, 1983, EVOKED POTENTIALS CL, P105
  • [9] SEX AND EAR DIFFERENCES OF BRAIN-STEM ACOUSTIC EVOKED-POTENTIALS IN A SAMPLE OF NORMAL FULL-TERM NEWBORNS - NORMATIVE STUDY
    CHIARENZA, GA
    DAMBROSIO, GM
    CAZZULLO, AG
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 71 (05): : 357 - 366
  • [10] AGE-RELATED LATENCY CHANGES IN THE BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS
    CHU, NS
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (06): : 431 - 436