Peer Review for Advanced Practice Nurses What Does It Really Mean?

被引:17
作者
Briggs, Linda A. [1 ]
Heath, Janie [1 ]
Kelley, Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Nursing & Hlth Studies, Washington, DC USA
关键词
advanced practice nursing; peer-review; advanced practice evaluation;
D O I
10.1097/00044067-200501000-00002
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Peer review has multiple manifestations and purposes. Two stated purposes are the demonstration of professionalism and clinical competency. The American Nurses Association (ANA) defines nursing peer-review as a process for evaluating the care provided by an individual according to accepted standards. Further, the ANA proposes that nurses with similar rank and clinical expertise should conduct these evaluations. Some local jurisdictions may also mandate that advanced practice nurses (APNs) review one another's care. Therefore, APNs should become familiar with sources for evaluation criteria and tool formats for APN peer review. The advantages and limitations of the various formats and processes of peer review should also be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 15
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
*AM NURS ASS, 1996, SCOP STAND ADV PRACT
[2]  
*AM NURS ASS, 1995, STAND CLIN PRACT SCO
[3]  
American Association of Critical Care Nurses, 2002, SCOP PRACT STAND PRO
[4]  
American Nurses Association, 1988, PEER REV GUID
[5]  
American Nurses Credentialing Center, 2003, MAGN REC PROGR HLTH, P106
[6]  
Cohen B, 1996, J Nurs Staff Dev, V12, P13
[7]   THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS - A METAANALYSIS [J].
GOLDMAN, RL .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1994, 17 (01) :3-21
[8]   THE RELIABILITY OF PEER ASSESSMENTS OF QUALITY OF CARE [J].
GOLDMAN, RL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (07) :958-960
[9]   Improving peer review: Alternatives to unstructured judgements by a single reviewer [J].
Goldman, RL ;
Ciesco, E .
JOINT COMMISSION JOURNAL ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT, 1996, 22 (11) :762-769
[10]  
Hamric AB, 1989, CLIN NURSE SPEC, P83