Better Regulation by Appeal

被引：0

作者：

Voermans, Wim ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Schuurmans, Ymre ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Leiden Univ, Constitut & Adm Law, Leiden, Netherlands

[2] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Law, Leiden, Netherlands

[3] European Acad Law & Legislat, The Hague, Netherlands

[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Publ Law, Constitut & Adm Law, Leiden, Netherlands

来源：

EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW | 2011年 / 17卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This paper looks into the way in which appeal and judicial review by the European Union (EU) Courts are or can be (made) instrumental to Better Regulation (BR). We examine the way EU Courts review EU legislation before and after the Lisbon Treaty and try to think through the possible consequences the Treaty changes of 2009 have. On this occasion, we take a closer look at the interesting and more or less parallel development of judicial review of non-primary legislation in the United States under the Administrative Procedure Act and the way judiciary review on individual appeal has been transformed into a cornerstone for BR. Is a similar development probable, if indeed advisable, in the EU?

引用

页码：507 / 525

页数：19

共 34 条

[11] Craig P., 2007, EU LAW TEXTS CASES M, P509
[12] DeVries MS, 2010, GOV PUBLIC MANAG, P1, DOI 10.1057/9780230277076
[13] Harter HJ, 1996, ADMIN LAW REV, V48, P309
[14] Koch C., 2005, EUROPEAN LAW REV, V30, P512
[15] Lenaerts K., 2006, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW E, P99
[16] Majone G., 2005, PITFALLS EUROPEAN IN, P85
[17] Mccubbins M. D., 1987, J LAW ECON ORGAN, V3, P243, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JLEO.A036930
[18] MEUWESE ACM, 2008, IMPACT ASSESSMENT EU
[19] Meuwese Anne, 2009, REV EUROPEAN ADM LAW, V2, P3
[20] THE ADMINISTRATIVE-PROCEDURE ACT - A LIVING AND RESPONSIVE LAW
MORRISON, AB
[J]. VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW, 1986, 72 (02) : 253 - 270

← 1 2 3 4 →