Better Regulation by Appeal

被引：0

作者：

Voermans, Wim ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Schuurmans, Ymre ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Leiden Univ, Constitut & Adm Law, Leiden, Netherlands

[2] Leiden Univ, Inst Publ Law, Leiden, Netherlands

[3] European Acad Law & Legislat, The Hague, Netherlands

[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Publ Law, Constitut & Adm Law, Leiden, Netherlands

来源：

EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW | 2011年 / 17卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

This paper looks into the way in which appeal and judicial review by the European Union (EU) Courts are or can be (made) instrumental to Better Regulation (BR). We examine the way EU Courts review EU legislation before and after the Lisbon Treaty and try to think through the possible consequences the Treaty changes of 2009 have. On this occasion, we take a closer look at the interesting and more or less parallel development of judicial review of non-primary legislation in the United States under the Administrative Procedure Act and the way judiciary review on individual appeal has been transformed into a cornerstone for BR. Is a similar development probable, if indeed advisable, in the EU?

引用

页码：507 / 525

页数：19

共 34 条

[1] The Better Regulation Initiative at the Judicial Gate: A Trojan Horse within the Commission's Walls or the Way Forward?
Alemanno, Alberto
[J]. EUROPEAN LAW JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (03) : 382 - 400
[2] [Anonymous], 1996, EUR LAW J, V2, P33
[3] Balthasar S, 2010, EUR LAW REV, V35, P542
[4] Barents R., 2008, VERDRAG LISSABON ACH, P508
[5] Bignami FE, 1999, HARVARD INT LAW J, V40, P451
[6] Breyer S.G., 2006, ADM LAW REGULATORY P
[7] Commission (EC), 2005, COM200597 EC
[8] Commission (EC), 2002, COM20020275 EC
[9] Commission (EU), 2010, COM2010543 EU
[10] Craig P., 2003, EUROPEAN PUBLIC LAW, V9, P493

← 1 2 3 4 →