The Economic Consequences of Divorce in Germany: What Has Changed since the Turn of the Millennium?

被引:35
作者
Broeckel, Miriam [1 ]
Andress, Hans-Juergen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bielefeld, D-33615 Bielefeld, Germany
[2] Univ Cologne, Wirtschafts & Sozialwissensch Fak, ISS, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Divorce consequences; Household income; Gender inequalities; SOEP;
D O I
10.12765/CPoS-2015-04en
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
Our analysis of data from almost 30 waves of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study ( SOEP) shows that the economic consequences of divorce are still more negative for women than for men despite increased female labour force participation and, correspondingly, increased numbers of dual earner households. After reviewing recent shifts in the institutional fabric and the social structure of the conservative German welfare state with respect to families and marriage, the empirical analysis investigates the economic consequences of a sample of 844 men and 1,006 women in five dimensions: child custody, support payments, housing, employment, and economic well-being. Change is measured by comparing data from before and after the turn of the millennium. Overall, the analyses show that the economic consequences of divorce are still more negative for women than for men after the turn of the millennium, although female labour participation has increased and the public child care system was expanded. Nevertheless, some signs of change become visible indicating that the gains and losses of marital disruption are not unilaterally distributed among the genders. That men may also depend on incomes of their spouses can be seen for the increasing number of dual earner households. Moreover, after the turn of the millennium, economic dependence on public transfers increased not only for women but also for men.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 312
页数:36
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Aisenbrey S, 2009, SOC FORCES, V88, P573
  • [2] Andre<ss> H. J., 2003, WENN LIEBE ROTE ZAHL
  • [3] The economic consequences of partnership dissolution -: A comparative analysis of panel studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden
    Andress, Hans-Juergen
    Borgloh, Barbara
    Broeckel, Miriam
    Giesselmann, Marco
    Hummelsheim, Dina
    [J]. EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 22 (05) : 533 - 560
  • [4] Andress Hans-Jurgen, 2007, SCHMOLLERS JB J APPL, V127, P193
  • [5] ANDRESS HJ, 2001, ARMUT GESELLSCHAFT, P169, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-322-99629-96
  • [6] Auspurg Katrin, 2011, Z SOZIOL, V40, P1
  • [7] BMFSFJ (Bundesministerium fur Familie Senioren Frauen und Jugend), 2003, WO BLEIBT ZEIT ZEITV
  • [8] Breen R., 2013, HDB CAUSAL ANAL SOCI, P167, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-6094-3_10
  • [9] Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Logit and Probit Models
    Breen, Richard
    Karlson, Kristian Bernt
    Holm, Anders
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2013, 42 (02) : 164 - 191
  • [10] BUHMANN B, 1988, REV INCOME WEALTH, P115