Improving diagnosis by improving education: a policy brief on education in healthcare professions

被引:55
作者
Graber, Mark L. [1 ,2 ]
Rencic, Joseph [3 ]
Rusz, Diana [1 ]
Papa, Frank [4 ]
Croskerry, Pat [5 ]
Zierler, Brenda [6 ]
Harkless, Gene [7 ]
Giuliano, Michael [8 ]
Schoenbaum, Stephen [9 ]
Colford, Cristin [10 ]
Cahill, Maureen [11 ]
Olson, Andrew P. J. [12 ]
机构
[1] Soc Improve Diag Med, New York, NY USA
[2] RTI Int, Raleigh, NC 27616 USA
[3] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[4] Univ North Texas Hlth Sci Ctr, Ft Worth, TX USA
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Halifax, NS, Canada
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Nursing, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Univ New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824 USA
[8] Seton Hall Univ, Fac Resident & Student Dev, S Orange, NJ 07079 USA
[9] Josiah Macy Jr Fdn, New York, NY USA
[10] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[11] Natl Council State Boards Nursing, Chicago, IL USA
[12] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Med Educator Scholarship & Dev, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
diagnosis; diagnostic error; education; interprofessional; training;
D O I
10.1515/dx-2018-0033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Diagnostic error is increasingly recognized as a major patient safety concern. Efforts to improve diagnosis have largely focused on safety and quality improvement initiatives that patients, providers, and health care organizations can take to improve the diagnostic process and its outcomes. This educational policy brief presents an alternative strategy for improving diagnosis, centered on future healthcare providers, to improve the education and training of clinicians in every health care profession. The hypothesis is that we can improve diagnosis by improving education. A literature search was first conducted to understand the relationship of education and training to diagnosis and diagnostic error in different health care professions. Based on the findings from this search we present the justification for focusing on education and training, recommendations for specific content that should be incorporated to improve diagnosis, and recommendations on educational approaches that should be used. Using an iterative, consensus-based process, we then developed a driver diagram that categorizes the key content into five areas. Learners should: 1) Acquire and effectively use a relevant knowledge base, 2) Optimize clinical reasoning to reduce cognitive error, 3) Understand system-related aspects of care, 4) Effectively engage patients and the diagnostic team, and 5) Acquire appropriate perspectives and attitudes about diagnosis. These domains echo recommendations in the National Academy of Medicine's report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. The National Academy report suggests that true interprofessional education and training, incorporating recent advances in understanding diagnostic error, and improving clinical reasoning and other aspects of education, can ultimately improve diagnosis by improving the knowledge, skills, and attitudes of all health care professionals.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 118
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, TEAMSTEPPS
[2]  
Baker D, 2006, HDB HUMAN FACTORS ER, P259
[3]   Human factors and error prevention in emergency medicine [J].
Bleetman, Anthony ;
Sanusi, Seliat ;
Dale, Trevor ;
Brace, Samantha .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2012, 29 (05) :389-393
[4]   Medical education: Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning [J].
Bowen, Judith L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (21) :2217-2225
[5]  
Cooke N, 2004, TEAM COGNITION
[6]  
Croskerry P, 2013, PATIENT SAFETY EMERG
[7]  
Croskerry P, 2005, ADV PATIENT SAFETY R, V2
[8]  
Croskerry P, 2017, MED SCI EDUC, V27, P9, DOI DOI 10.1007/S40670-017-0499-9
[9]  
Croskerry P, 2017, DIAGNOSIS INTERPRETI
[10]   Cognitive debiasing 2: impediments to and strategies for change [J].
Croskerry, Pat ;
Singhal, Geeta ;
Mamede, Silvia .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 :ii65-ii72