The perils of 'impact' for academic social science

被引:10
作者
Hammersley, Martyn [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Fac Educ & Language Studies, Dept Childhood Youth & Sport, Briggs Bldg,Second Floor, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
关键词
impact; academic research and policy-making/practice; the public function of social science;
D O I
10.1080/21582041.2014.923580
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
'Impact' has become a standard way of conceptualising the contributions that research makes to policy-making and practice, this reflecting in large part the shift from a state patronage to an investment model of research funding. However, little attention has been given to the metaphor that underpins the term 'impact'. Yet this is important because there are ways in which it can distort our understanding of the public contribution of academic research, and thereby create false expectations about it. Some problematic assumptions built into the metaphor are examined, along with several ways in which it may obscure our understanding of the relationship between research and policy-making or practice.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 355
页数:11
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ABBOTT ANDREW, 2001, TIME MATTERS THEORY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, IMPACT SOCIAL SCI AC
[3]   Knowledge mobilisation and the social sciences: dancing with new partners in an age of austerity [J].
Bannister, Jon ;
Hardill, Irene .
CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2013, 8 (03) :167-175
[4]  
Brewer J, 2011, METHODOLOGICAL INNOV, V6, P9
[5]  
Brown C., 2013, MAKING EVIDENCE MATT
[6]  
Collini S., 2013, LONDON REV BOOKS, V35, P3
[7]  
Collini Stefan, 2012, WHAT ARE U
[8]  
Crouch C., 2011, STRANGE NONDEATH NEO
[9]  
Davies H., 2005, ASSESSING IMPACT SOC
[10]  
Davies H., 2005, APPROACHES ASSESSING