Role competency scale on shared decision-making nurses: Development and psychometric properties

被引：10

作者：

Tariman, Joseph D. ^{[1
]}

Katz, Pamela ^{[2
]}

Bishop-Royse, Jessica ^{[1
]}

Hartle, Lisa ^{[3
]}

Szubski, Katharine L. ^{[4
]}

Enecio, Toreend ^{[2
]}

Garcia, Ima ^{[5
]}

Spawn, Nadia ^{[1
]}

Masterton, Katherine Jones ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Depaul Univ, 990 W Fullerton Ave,Suite 3000, Chicago, IL 60614 USA

[2] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA

[3] Sinai Hosp, 2401 W Belvedere Ave, Baltimore, MD 21215 USA

[4] Advocate Hlth Care, Libertyville, IL USA

[5] Quintiles Inc, Durham, NC USA

来源：

SAGE OPEN MEDICINE | 2018年 / 6卷

关键词：

Shared decision-making; role competency; psychometric properties; oncology; hematology; nursing;

D O I：

10.1177/2050312118807614

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Objectives: This study aimed to develop a scale that can measure the role competency of oncology nurses during shared decision-making process. Methods: A total of 226 oncology nurses who actively provide direct care to patients from inpatient and outpatient oncology units in the Midwest and Pacific Northwest completed the online or mail survey. Exploratory factor analysis and parallel analysis showed the multidimensionality of the role competency scale on shared decision-making nurses. Results: The role competency scale on shared decision-making nurses revealed four dimensions: knowledge, attitudes, communication, and adaptability. The 22 items have excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91. The four subscales also have adequate reliability with Cronbach's alpha >0.70 as well as greater than 0.70 Spearman-Brown's correlation coefficients in split-half reliability testing for each subscale. Conclusion: The new scale has the potential to be used as a clinical tool to assess the need for shared decision-making education and training in oncology nurses.

引用

页数：10

共 43 条

[1]

Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, 2015, TEAMSTEPPS 2 0

[2]

Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, 2013, SHAR DEC MAK

[3] Sharing decisions in breast cancer care: Development of the Decision Analysis System for Oncology (DAS-O) to identify shared decision making during treatment consultations [J].

Brown, Richard F. ;

Butow, Phyllis N. ;

Juraskova, Ilona ;

Ribi, Karin ;

Gerber, Daniela ;

Bernhard, Jurg ;

Tattersall, Martin H. N. .

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2011, 14 (01) :29-37

[4] Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].

Charles, C ;

Gafni, A ;

Whelan, T .

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692

[5] Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model [J].

Charles, C ;

Gafni, A ;

Whelan, T .

SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 49 (05) :651-661

[6] The impact of DECISION+2 on patient intention to engage in shared decision making: secondary analysis of a multicentre clustered randomized trial [J].

Couet, Nicolas ;

Labrecque, Michel ;

Robitaille, Hubert ;

Turcotte, Stephane ;

Legare, France .

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) :2629-2637

[7]

DeVellis RF, 2017, SCALE DEV THEORY APP, V4th

[8]

Doorenbos AZ, 2008, ONCOL NURS FORUM, V35, P891, DOI [10.1188/08.ONF.E100-E107, 10.1188/08.ONF. E100-E107]

[9] The development of COMRADE - a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations [J].

Edwards, A ;

Elwyn, G ;

Hood, K ;

Robling, M ;

Atwell, C ;

Holmes-Rovner, M ;

Kinnersley, P ;

Houston, H ;

Russell, I .

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) :311-322

[10] Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement [J].

Elwyn, G ;

Edwards, A ;

Wensing, M ;

Hood, K ;

Atwell, C ;

Grol, R .

QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (02) :93-99

← 1 2 3 4 5 →