Managerial innovations in central government: not wrong, but hard to explain

被引:18
作者
Arnaboldi, Michela [1 ]
Azzone, Giovanni [1 ]
Palermo, Tommaso [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Milan, Italy
关键词
Public sector organizations; Managerialism; Innovation; Organizational change; Central government; Italy;
D O I
10.1108/09513551011012349
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the adoption of managerial innovations in the public sector, identifying the reasons why their uptake and use may fail. Design/methodology/approach - The problem is investigated empirically through a case study approach. The change processes resulting from the adoption of two managerial innovations within the same Italian Central Government Institution are illustrated in detail. Findings - Both cases represent a failure in the adoption and use of managerial innovations, attributable to a complex interplay of external and organisational forces. The empirical investigation points out the relevancy of individuals' actions and choices. The real explanation for the failure of both projects in fact seems to be key individuals' inability: first to "make sense" of what the innovation was about and second to communicate this "sense" throughout the organisation. Research limitations/implications - The findings are based on data from the Italian Central Government, and as such are not extendable elsewhere. However, the mechanisms of change examined here may be of wider interest to other public sector organisations. Originality/value - The paper analyses a real-world attempt to deploy managerial innovations in the public sector, and the resultant impact. A theoretical framework based on institutional theory and its recent advances is used to better understand the plural factors influencing the use of managerial innovations.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   The (un)intended outcome of public sector performance measurement [J].
Adcroft, Andy ;
Willis, Robert .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT, 2005, 18 (05) :386-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MANAGE ACCOUNT RES
[3]   ACCOUNTING, AMBIGUITY, AND THE NEW INSTITUTIONALISM [J].
CARRUTHERS, BG .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1995, 20 (04) :313-328
[4]  
Covaleski MA, 2003, J MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT, V15, P3, DOI DOI 10.2308/JMAR.2003.15.1.3
[5]  
DiMaggio P., 1991, NEW I ORG ANAL, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10551-009-0264-0
[6]   The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983) [J].
DiMaggio, PJ ;
Powell, WW .
ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 :143-166
[7]  
Dixon J., 1998, INT J PUBLIC SECTOR, V11, P164, DOI DOI 10.1108/09513559810216483
[8]   Institutional entrepreneurship, partaking, and convening [J].
Dorado, S .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2005, 26 (03) :385-414
[9]   Reconciling institutional theory with organizational theories -: How neoinstitutionalism resolves five paradoxes [J].
Fernandez-Alles, Maria de la luz ;
Valle-Cabrera, Ramon .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 19 (04) :503-517
[10]   Political versus managerial use of cost and performance accounting [J].
Flury, Reto ;
Schedler, Kuno .
PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2006, 26 (04) :229-234