Comparison of postpartum sonographic findings after uneventful vaginal and cesarean section deliveries

被引:3
作者
Cilingir, Isil Uzun [1 ]
Sayin, Cenk [1 ]
Sutcu, Havva [1 ]
Alici, Ebru [1 ]
Inan, Cihan [1 ]
Erzincan, Selen [1 ]
Yener, Cem [1 ]
Varol, Fusun [1 ]
机构
[1] Thakya Univ, Fac Med, Dept Perinatol, Edirne, Turkey
关键词
sonography; postpartum; cesarean delivery; postpartum bleeding;
D O I
10.15557/JoU.2018.0045
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To prospectively determine the sonographic findings of the postpartum uterus 24 hours after vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Methods: Women who had uneventful vaginal delivery or cesarean section from July 2015 to May 2018 in a tertiary care hospital were prospectively included. Uterine lengths, endometrium, amout of free fluid, the distance between the uterine fundus-promontorium and uterine fundus-L5 were evaluated 24 hours after delivery. Results: The mean (min-max) endometrial thickness in the vaginal delivery and cesarean section groups were 13.3 (4-25) and 12.4 (4-29) mm, respectively. Fundus-cervix length was significantly higher in the vaginal delivery group compared to the cesarean section group (184.05 +/- 16.8 vs 163.6 +/- 6.7 mm, p < 0.001). The measurements of anterior and anterior-posterior walls of the uterus, anteroposterior uterine length and uterine width were similar in both groups. Promontorium-fundus length was significantly higher in patients who delivered vaginally than those by cesarean section (123.3 +/- 13.6 vs 108.7 +/- 23.3 mm, p = 0.005). Conclusion: The measurement of L5-fundus distance is a simple and effective technique to evaluate the size of the uterus. Homogenous endometrium up to 30 mm in asymptomatic patients may be a normal finding 24 hours after delivery. The results of this study may be helpful in the decision-making process in cases of early postpartum hemorrhage or hemodynamic instability.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 315
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage [J].
Al-Zirqi, I. ;
Vangen, S. ;
Forsen, L. ;
Stray-Pedersen, B. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (10) :1265-1272
[2]   Sonographic detection of fluid collections and postoperative morbidity following Cesarean section and hysterectomy [J].
Antonelli, E ;
Morales, MA ;
Dumps, P ;
Boulvain, M ;
Weil, A .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 23 (04) :388-392
[3]  
Carlan SJ, 1997, J CLIN ULTRASOUND, V25, P301, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0096(199707)25:6<301::AID-JCU3>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-G
[5]   Ultrasonographic evaluation of the postpartum uterus [J].
Edwards, A ;
Ellwood, DA .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 16 (07) :640-643
[6]   Imaging and Diagnosis of Postpartum Complications Sonography and Other Imaging Modalities [J].
Kamaya, Aya ;
Ro, Kyung ;
Benedetti, Nancy J. ;
Chang, Pauline L. ;
Desser, Terry S. .
ULTRASOUND QUARTERLY, 2009, 25 (03) :151-162
[7]   Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound findings within 24 hours following uneventful Cesarean section [J].
Koskas, M. ;
Nizard, J. ;
Salomon, L. J. ;
Ville, Y. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 32 (04) :520-526
[8]   ULTRASONIC PREDICTION OF COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING NORMAL VAGINAL DELIVERY [J].
LIPINSKI, JK ;
ADAM, AH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1981, 9 (01) :17-19
[9]   Abdominopelvic ultrasonographic findings after uncomplicated delivery [J].
Lousquy, R. ;
Pernin, E. ;
Delpech, Y. ;
Ricbourg, A. ;
Dohan, A. ;
Soyer, P. ;
Barranger, E. .
DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2016, 97 (01) :45-51
[10]  
Luo A, 2015, CLIN EXP OBSTET GYN, V42, P104