RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL OF MIDAZOLAM PLACEBO AND MIDAZOLAM FENTANYL FOR SEDATION AND ANALGESIA IN LOWER-EXTREMITY ANGIOGRAPHY

被引:27
作者
CRAGG, AH [1 ]
SMITH, TP [1 ]
BERBAUM, KS [1 ]
NAKAGAWA, N [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV IOWA,COLL MED,DEPT RADIOL,IOWA CITY,IA 52242
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.157.1.2048514
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Safety and efficacy of two drug regimens used for sedation and analgesia during lower-extremity angiography were studied. Midazolam (loading dose 14.5-mu-g/kg; maintenance dose, 7.2-mu-g/kg) with or without fentanyl (loading dose, 0.725-mu-g/kg; maintenance dose, 0.362-mu-g/kg) was administered in a blind fashion as an IV bolus to 50 patients. Hemodynamic responses were monitored, and a standardized questionnaire was given to the patient before, immediately after, and 8-24 hr after the procedure. Physicians also were asked questions after the procedure. Heart rate and oxygen saturation were not significantly different before and 2 min after administration or between groups. A small but significant decrease in blood pressure occurred 2 min after the loading dose was given in both groups. Both drug regimens had statistically significant anxiolytic effects; however, anxiolytic effects were superior in the midazolam/fentanyl group (p < .02). Patients rated the overall effectiveness of anesthesia with midazolam/fentanyl as superior (p < .02). Analysis of physicians' judgments of the effectiveness of sedation and analgesia showed a statistically significant advantage for the midazolam/fentanyl group (p < .01). We conclude that midazolam/fentanyl appears to be as safe as and more efficacious than midazolam alone for sedation and analgesia during lower-extremity angiography.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 176
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   FENTANYL AND MIDAZOLAM - AN ALTERNATIVE TO DIAZEPAM [J].
AYRESMITH, G .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (01) :285-285
[2]   RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION BY MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM [J].
FORSTER, A ;
GARDAZ, JP ;
SUTER, PM ;
GEMPERLE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1980, 53 (06) :494-497
[3]  
GRELL FL, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P523
[4]   A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR SEDATION IN UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
MAGNI, VC ;
FROST, RA ;
LEUNG, JWC ;
COTTON, PB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1983, 55 (11) :1095-1101
[5]   FENTANYL AND DIAZEPAM FOR ANALGESIA AND SEDATION DURING RADIOLOGIC SPECIAL PROCEDURES [J].
MILLER, DL ;
WALL, RT .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 162 (01) :195-198
[6]  
Ochs M W, 1986, Anesth Prog, V33, P230
[7]  
PERSSON MP, 1988, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V43, P324
[8]  
REDMOND PL, 1987, RADIOLOGY, V164, P284, DOI 10.1148/radiology.164.1.284-a
[9]   MIDAZOLAM - PHARMACOLOGY AND USES [J].
REVES, JG ;
FRAGEN, RJ ;
VINIK, HR ;
GREENBLATT, DJ .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (03) :310-324
[10]  
SKARVAN K, 1986, ANAESTHESIST, V35, P17