The false dichotomy between Guarantee-constitutionalism and judicial activism

被引:0
作者
Duquelsky Gomez, Diego J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Jose C Paz, Jose C Paz, Argentina
来源
DOXA-CUADERNOS DE FILOSOFIA Y DERECHO | 2018年 / 41卷
关键词
judicial activism; guarantee-constitutionalism; FERRAJOLI; democratic legitimacy; economic; social and cultural rigths; critical legal studies;
D O I
10.14198/DOXA2018.41.10
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The emergence of different post-positivist theories of law, particularly those called neo-constitutionalists, have placed at the center of the philosophical scene the alleged tension between respect for constitutional guarantees and judicial activism. This paper tries to show how, particularly in the Latin American countries, it is not only a false dichotomy, but in many cases those proactive judicial practices are the only possible way to guarantee the protection of fundamental rights -especially economic, social and political rights-.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 209
页数:17
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] ABRAMOVICH V., 2002, DERECHOS SOCIALES CO
  • [2] Two Versions of Constitutionalism
    Atienza, Manuel
    [J]. DOXA-CUADERNOS DE FILOSOFIA Y DERECHO, 2011, 34 : 73 - 88
  • [3] BAQUE J, 1995, HAY DERECHO, V12, P9
  • [4] Bohm Maria Laura, 2015, REV LETRA DERECHO PE, V1, P8
  • [5] CALERA Nicolas Lopez, 1978, USO ALTERNATIVO DERE
  • [6] CARAMELO DIAZ G, 2015, PENSAR DERECHO BUENO, V6, P99
  • [7] CARCOVA C, 2001, OTRA MIRADA
  • [8] CARCOVA C, 1996, DERECHO POLITICA MAG, P151
  • [9] Carcova C. M., 2009, REV ELECT I INVESTIG, VIII, P33
  • [10] Carrio Genaro, 1994, NOTAS DERECHO LENGUA