LOCUS OF INFORMATION IN WORDS AND THE RIGHT VISUAL-FIELD EFFECT

被引:26
作者
BRYDEN, MP
MONDOR, TA
LOKEN, M
INGLETON, MA
BERGSTROM, K
机构
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0278-2626(90)90059-W
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The right visual field (RVF) advantage found for the identification or classification of words has usually been interpreted as evidence for left hemisphere language functions. It has more recently been explained as the result of the fact that the most informative part of the word, presumably the beginning, is in a region of better visual acuity. It is not clear from existing evidence that the beginnings of words are in fact more informative. The present study assessed the locus of information in words by deleting either the initial or terminal one or two letters. Subjects were required to generate a completion. Regardless of whether subjects were scored as correct for generating the original target word (as would be appropriate in a naming study) or for producing any legitimate word (as would be appropriate for a lexical decision study), the results indicated that most words have more information in the initial letters. Nevertheless, there are exceptions to this rule, and some words have more terminal information. Equal numbers of words with more initial information and with more terminal information were selected for two visual field studies in order to assess the effect of the locus of information on visual laterality. In neither a lexical decision study nor a naming study did locus of information affect the commonly observed right visual field superiority. Thus the distribution of information is not likely to be a major confounding variable in laterality studies employing horizontally presented words. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 58
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Beaumont J.G., 1982, DIVIDED VISUAL FIELD
[2]   A NOTE ON THE INFORMATIVENESS OF PARTS OF WORDS [J].
BRUNER, JS ;
ODOWD, D .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1958, 1 (02) :98-101
[3]   ON THE POSSIBLE DANGERS OF USING HORIZONTAL WORD DISPLAYS IN VISUAL-FIELD STUDIES [J].
BRYDEN, MP .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1986, 5 (03) :362-368
[4]  
BRYDEN MP, 1982, LATERALITY
[5]   SCANNING THE VISUAL-FIELD WITHOUT EYE-MOVEMENTS - A SEX DIFFERENCE [J].
EFRON, R ;
YUND, EW ;
NICHOLS, DR .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1987, 25 (04) :637-644
[6]   IMPORTANCE OF BEING FIRST - TACHISTOSCOPIC STUDY OF CONTRIBUTION OF EACH LETTER TO RECOGNITION OF 4-LETTER WORDS [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 15 (01) :66-72
[7]   THE TORONTO-WORD-POOL - NORMS FOR IMAGERY, CONCRETENESS, ORTHOGRAPHIC VARIABLES, AND GRAMMATICAL USAGE FOR 1,080 WORDS [J].
FRIENDLY, M ;
FRANKLIN, PE ;
HOFFMAN, D ;
RUBIN, DC .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS & INSTRUMENTATION, 1982, 14 (04) :375-399
[8]   AGE-OF-ACQUISITION, IMAGERY, CONCRETENESS, FAMILIARITY, AND AMBIGUITY MEASURES FOR 1,944 WORDS [J].
GILHOOLY, KJ ;
LOGIE, RH .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS & INSTRUMENTATION, 1980, 12 (04) :395-427
[9]   LATERALITY AND SEX-DIFFERENCES FOR VISUAL RECOGNITION OF EMOTIONAL AND NON-EMOTIONAL WORDS [J].
GRAVES, R ;
LANDIS, T ;
GOODGLASS, H .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1981, 19 (01) :95-102
[10]   WORDS AND HEMIFIELDS - DO THE HEMISPHERES ENJOY EQUAL-OPPORTUNITY [J].
KIRSNER, K ;
SCHWARTZ, S .
BRAIN AND COGNITION, 1986, 5 (03) :354-361