CHEST GESTALT AND DETECTABILITY OF LUNG LESIONS

被引:13
作者
OESTMANN, JW
GREENE, R
BOURGOUIN, PM
LINETSKY, L
LLEWELLYN, HJ
机构
[1] Department of Radiology, University Hospital Leiden
[2] Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
[3] Department of Radiology Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Que.
[4] Department of Radiology, Drs. Shear, Ahearn and Associates, Tampa, FL
关键词
THORAX; RADIOGRAPHY; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(93)90015-F
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Image perception in chest radiography is thought to occur on two levels, (a) a fast global response based on learned templates (''gestalt'') and, (b) a slower systematic scan process. The relative importance of ''gestalt'' on the detection of nodular lung cancers was studied by disturbing the ''gestalt'' through rotation of the radiograph but not actually diminishing the image content available for viewing. Sixty chest radiographs (20 normals, 21 with subtle lung cancers, 19 with obvious lung cancers) were presented to three readers in normal and abnormal (rotated randomly in 90 degree increments) orientation for varying durations (0.25 s, 1 s, 4 s and unlimited viewing time). The results indicate that the detectability of obvious and subtle lung lesions was degraded by the disturbed ''gestalt'' for both short and long viewing times. The readers did not significantly increase their unlimited viewing time when faced with rotated images (4.4 +/- 3.4 s) as opposed to non-rotated images (4.0 +/- 3.2 s). We conclude that the detection of lung lesions relies heavily on the chest ''gestalt'' and that systematic scanning cannot fully compensate for an impaired global response due to a disturbed ''gestalt''.
引用
收藏
页码:154 / 157
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Kundel, Nodine, Interpreting chest radiographs without visual search, Radiology, 116, pp. 527-532, (1975)
  • [2] Revesz, Kundel, Graber, The influence of structured noise on the detection of radiologic abnormalities, Invest Radiol, 9, pp. 479-486, (1974)
  • [3] Kundel, Nodine, Thickman, Carmody, Toto, Nodule detection with and without a chest image, Invest Radiol, 20, pp. 94-99, (1985)
  • [4] Oestmann, Greene, Kushner, Bourgouin, Linetsky, Llewellyn, Viewing time and detectability of lung lesions, Radiology, 166, pp. 451-453, (1988)
  • [5] Oestmann, Borcke, von Boehmer, Grote, Hendrickx, Majewski, Mucke, Stender, Der Einfluss der Betrachtungszeit auf die Wahrnehmung von Details im Röntgenbild, RöFo, 148, 3, pp. 314-318, (1988)
  • [6] Metz, Basic principles of ROC analysis, Semin Nucl Med, 8, pp. 283-298, (1978)
  • [7] Dorfman, Alf, Maximum likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals — rating-method data, J Math Psych, 6, pp. 487-496, (1969)
  • [8] Hanley, McNeil, The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology, 143, pp. 29-36, (1982)
  • [9] Lams, Cocklin, Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases, Radiology, 158, pp. 11-19, (1986)
  • [10] Goodman, Foley, Wilson, Rimm, Lawson, Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with film digital radiography system, Radiology, 158, pp. 27-33, (1986)