Functional design of games to support natural resource management policy development

被引:27
作者
Bots, Pieter [1 ]
van Daalen, Els [2 ]
机构
[1] Montpellier Reg Ctr, CEMAGREF, BP 5095, F-34033 Montpellier 1, France
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Technol Policy & Management, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
alternative solutions; game design; game properties; gaming; mediation; natural resource management (NRM); policy analysis; policy development; policy games; policy contexts as systems; representations; stakeholder views; strategy; rewards; roles; values clarification;
D O I
10.1177/1046878107300674
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article works toward a conceptual framework for designing games to support policy development for managing natural resources. The point of departure for this framework is a typology for functions of games in support of policy. This typology consists of six classes of functions of a policy game: research and analyze policy contexts as systems, design and recommend alternative solutions to a policy problem, provide advice to a client on what strategy to follow in the policy process, mediate between different stakeholders, democratize policy development by actively bringing in stakeholder views, and clarify the values and arguments pertinent to the policy discourse. These functions are illustrated using specific examples of games that have been used in the domain of natural resource management (NRM). The framework discussed in this article may help game designers to match specific game properties (players, roles, rewards, and representations of the NRM context) with the intended function of the game in the policy-development process.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 532
页数:21
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Aarseth E., 2003, COMPUTER GAMES WHATS, P48
[2]  
Anderson C. M., 2004, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, V33, P193
[3]  
Barreteau O., 2003, J ARTIFICIAL SOC SOC, V6
[4]  
Bousquet F, 2002, COMPLEXITY AND ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT, P248
[5]  
Brewer G., 1986, SUSTAINABLE DEV BIOS, P455
[6]  
CSIRIK JA, 2001, ELECT COMMERCE, P139
[7]  
Deutsch M., 2011, HDB CONFLICT RESOLUT
[8]  
Duke R.D., 2004, POLICY GAMES STRATEG
[9]  
Fischer F., 1993, ARGUMENTATIVE TURN P
[10]  
Frieling D. H., 1998, METROPOLITANE DEBAT