Application of A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Accident Analysis Method Selecting in Oil Industry

被引:3
作者
Ahmadi, Omran [1 ]
Mortazavi, Seyyed Bagher [1 ]
Khavanin, Ali [1 ]
Fesharaki, Mohammad Gholami [2 ]
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Occupat Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Tehran, Iran
来源
HEALTH SCOPE | 2018年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
Accident; Decision; Oil;
D O I
10.5812/jhealthscope.80348
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Selecting the appropriate method for analysis of accidents is an important phase in accident investigation, due to the varieties of factors affecting the selection process, varieties of accident analysis methods, and their specific strengths and weaknesses. Objectives: This study was carried out with aim of determining the important criteria that accident analysis methods should have and selecting the optimal method for analysis of accidents in the Iranian oil industry. Methods: The fuzzy analytical network process (FANP) technique was used to address the relative importance of the evaluation criteria and sub-criteria (pair-wise comparisons of criteria was carried out by oil industry safety expert) for selecting accident analysis methods. Fuzzy TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) were used for accident analysis methods prioritizing and ranking (methods was scored by occupational health post-graduate students). Results: Results indicated that the multiple levels cause identification capability and provides solution are the most and least important criteria in comparison with the other criteria for selecting accident analysis method, respectively. Based on the studied criteria, it was concluded that tripod beta (CCi = 0.303) can be used as an optimal method for accident analysis in oil industry. Conclusions: The present study found that Tripod beta has a greater ability to analyze oil industry accidents compared with the other methods under consideration. However, it has limitations, which can be addressed by other methods.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Ayeko M., 2002, P1 WORKSH INV REP IN
[2]   RATING ACCIDENT MODELS AND INVESTIGATION METHODOLOGIES [J].
BENNER, L .
JOURNAL OF SAFETY RESEARCH, 1985, 16 (03) :105-126
[3]  
Bird F. E., 1996, PRACTICAL LOSS CONTR
[4]  
Carhart N, 2010, P 28 INT C SYST DYN
[5]   Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP [J].
Chang, DY .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) :649-655
[6]   ARAMIS project:: A more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance [J].
de Dianous, V ;
Fiévez, C .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2006, 130 (03) :220-233
[7]   Accident investigation: From searching direct causes to finding in-depth causes - Problem of analysis or/and of analyst? [J].
Dien, Yves ;
Dechy, Nicolas ;
Guillaume, Eve .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2012, 50 (06) :1398-1407
[8]  
GROENEWEG J, 1996, CONTROLLING CONTROLL
[9]   Evaluating safety in the management of maintenance activities in the chemical process industry [J].
Hale, AR ;
Heming, BHJ ;
Smit, K ;
Rodenburg, FGT ;
van Leeuwen, ND .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 1998, 28 (01) :21-44
[10]   An extension of the Human Factors Analysis and Classification System for use in open systems [J].
Harris, D. ;
Li, W. -C. .
THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2011, 12 (02) :108-128