Bojkovice: Transformation of a peripheral micro-region at the Czech-Slovak border

被引:2
作者
Vaishar, Antonin [1 ]
St'astna, Milada [1 ]
机构
[1] Mendel Univ Brno, Dept Appl & Landscape Ecol, Zemedelska 1, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
关键词
rural region; periphery; countryside; collaboration; prosperity;
D O I
10.1515/bog-2016-0020
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The paper analyses the problem of a rural region in the peripheral position. Bojkovice micro-region on the Czech (Moravian)-Slovak border has been chosen as a case study. Economic transformation of productive and non-productive branches, demographic development (depopulation and aging) and networking in the area were characterized by using statistical data and field research. Development, understood as improvement in quality of life and not in sense of quantitative growth, is highlighted with regard to the changing perception of the countryside. The question remains: how to use peripherality for prosperity? Peripheral countryside is known as "the right countryside" in comparison to suburbanized and globalized countryside in core regions. Based on the research, production embedded in local sources and traditions, ecological agriculture using the protection of landscape and soft tourism are proposed as solutions. Networking like the association of municipalities, LEADER local action group or White Carpathian Euroregion could be the instruments of micro-regional collaboration. The human and social factors seem to be more important than objective conditions. Long-term population stability is the main advantage. However, a lower level of formal education could be a problem. The character of social capital is considered as a decisive circumstance - whether it is passive social capital resistant to outer innovations or active social capital open for now ideas. (C) 2016 Nicolaus Copernicus University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 145
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance [J].
Anderson, J ;
O'Dowd, L .
REGIONAL STUDIES, 1999, 33 (07) :593-604
[2]  
[Anonymous], DAT DEM UD OBC CR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CELOSTATNI SCITANI S
[4]  
[Anonymous], SCIT LID DOM BYT 201
[5]   AGRICULTURE AND LANDSCAPE IN 21ST CENTURY EUROPE: THE POST-COMMUNIST TRANSITION [J].
Blacksell, Mark .
EUROPEAN COUNTRYSIDE, 2010, 2 (01) :13-24
[6]   Embeddedness or Escapism? Rural Perceptions and Economic Development in Cornwall and Northumberland [J].
Bosworth, Gary ;
Willett, Joanie .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2011, 51 (02) :195-214
[7]   RESEARCHING ELEMENTS OF CROSS-BORDER SOCIAL COHESION: THE CASE OF SLOVENE BORDER AREAS [J].
Bufon, Milan .
EUROPEAN COUNTRYSIDE, 2013, 5 (02) :89-101
[8]  
Chromy P, 2010, GEOGRAFIE-PRAGUE, V115, P223
[9]   From core-periphery to polycentric development: Concepts of spatial and aspatial peripherality [J].
Copus, AK .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2001, 9 (04) :539-552
[10]   CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION IN THE EUROREGIONS AT THE POLISH-CZECH AND POLISH-SLOVAK BORDERS [J].
Dolzblasz, Sylwia .
EUROPEAN COUNTRYSIDE, 2013, 5 (02) :102-114