Non-Classical Stems from Classical: N.A. Vasiliev's Approach to Logic and his Reassessment of the Square of Opposition

被引:2
作者
Bazhanov, Valentin A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulyanovsk State Univ, Dept Philosophy, POB 1602, Ulyanovsk 432063 63, Russia
关键词
Non-Aristotelian logic; square of opposition; triangle of opposition; classifications of propositions; the law of non-self-contradiction; metalogic;
D O I
10.1007/s11787-007-0027-6
中图分类号
B81 [逻辑学(论理学)];
学科分类号
010104 ; 010105 ;
摘要
In the XIXth century there was a persistent opposition to Aristotelian logic. Nicolai A. Vasiliev (1880-1940) noted this opposition and stressed that the way for the novel - non-Aristotelian - logic was already paved. He made an attempt to construct non-Aristotelian logic (1910) within, so to speak, the form (but not in the spirit) of the Aristotelian paradigm (mode of reasoning). What reasons forced him to reassess the status of particular propositions and to replace the square of opposition by the triangle of opposition? What arguments did Vasiliev use for the introduction of new classes of propositions and statement of existence of various levels in logic? What was the meaning and role of the "method of Lobachevsky" which was implemented in construction of imaginary logic? Why did psychologism in the case of Vasiliev happen to be an important factor in the composition of the new 'imaginary' logic, as he called it?
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 76
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bazhanov V., 2001, ZWISCHEN TRADITIONEL, P205
[2]  
Bazhanov V. A., 1998, LOGIQUE ANAL, V161, P17
[3]  
Bazhanov V.A., 1988, NA VASILIEV 1880 194
[4]  
Bazhanov V. A., 1994, MODERN LOGIC, V4, P148
[5]  
Bazhanov V. A., 2006, VASILIEV NA
[6]   THE FATE OF ONE FORGOTTEN IDEA - VASILIEV,N.A. AND HIS IMAGINARY LOGIC [J].
BAZHANOV, VA .
STUDIES IN SOVIET THOUGHT, 1990, 39 (3-4) :333-341
[7]  
Bazhanov Valentin A., 2007, HIST LOGIC RUSSIA US
[8]  
deMorgan A., 1846, T CAMBRIDGE PHILOS S, V8, P379
[9]  
Hamilton W., 1859, LECT METAPHYSICS LOG, V1, DOI [10.1037/12154-000, DOI 10.1037/12154-000]
[10]  
Hamilton W., 1853, DISCUSSIONS PHILOS L, P117