COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PHENOTYPIC METHODS FOR AmpC DETECTION

被引:0
|
作者
Rashid, Mohd. [1 ]
Naim, Huma [1 ]
Khalid, Mohd. [2 ]
Shukla, Indu [3 ]
机构
[1] FH Med Coll, Dept Microbiol, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Hakeem Rais Unani Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Kulliyat, Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] AMU, JNMC, Dept Microbiol, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
AmpC beta-Lactamase; Double Disk Synergy Test; 3D Extract; Boronic Acid; AmpC Disk Test;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2018/681
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AmpC beta-lactamases are clinically important cephalosporinases which confer resistance to cephamycins, penicillins, aminoglycosides and beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and produced in several Enterobacteriaceae. The aim of this study was to compare various phenotypic detection methods of AmpC beta-Lactamases. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a descriptive study. Three hundred multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates were tested for AmpC beta-lactamase enzyme production. Cefoxitin (30 mu g) resistance was used as the screening test for AmpC enzyme detection. Phenotypic confirmation was done by conventional disk combination method (Cefoxitin/cefoxitin + boronic acid), 3D extract method, double disk synergy test (DDST) and AmpC disk test. RESULTS All 300 strains were found to be AmpC positive by the screening test. Out of these 300 strains, 100 strains were positive by disk combination method, 107 strains by DDST, 111 strains by 3D extract method and 170 strains by AmpC disk test. CONCLUSION Cefoxitin resistance can be used as the screening test for AmpC. AmpC disc test is simple to perform. Many strains can be checked on single petri plate and get best results in comparison to other methods of AmpC detection. So, it can be used as a phenotypic method for detection of AmpC enzyme production in resource-limited settings, where genotypic detection methods are not available.
引用
收藏
页码:3032 / 3037
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of the Different Plasmid-Mediated AmpC Beta-Lactamase Genotypes on the Phenotypic Detection of ESBL in Enterobacteriaceae Isolates
    Adel, Heba
    Elewa, Ahmad
    Mashaly, Mervat
    CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2022, 68 (12) : 2496 - 2508
  • [32] Comparison of 3 Phenotypic-detection Methods for Identifying Plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis Strains
    Lee, Wookeun
    Jung, Bochan
    Hong, Seong Geun
    Song, Wonkeun
    Jeong, Seok Hoon
    Lee, Kyungwon
    Kwak, Hyo-Sun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2009, 29 (05): : 448 - 454
  • [33] Carbapenemase detection by phenotypic methods
    Kaase, M.
    Kaminski, A.
    Szabados, F.
    Anders, A.
    Gatermann, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 301 : 2 - 2
  • [34] Comparison of sCIM and Other Phenotypic Detection Methods for Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales
    Hosoda, Takuya
    Doi, Yohei
    Suzuki, Masahiro
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (03):
  • [35] Comparison of phenotypic versus genotypic methods in the detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus
    Mohanasoundaram, K. M.
    Lalitha, M. K.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 127 (01) : 78 - 84
  • [36] COMPARISON OF 3 DIFFERENT METHODS FOR TARGET DETECTION AND TRACKING
    EECKMAN, FH
    COLVIN, ME
    AXELROD, TS
    OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 1993, 32 (11) : 2741 - 2748
  • [37] Comparison of different methods for detection of diastolic filling abnormalities
    Whalley, GA
    Walsh, HJ
    Gamble, GD
    Doughty, RN
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2005, 18 (07) : 710 - 717
  • [38] Comparison of Different Methods of Detection of Enteric Pathogenic Protozoa
    Ahmed, N. H.
    Chowdhary, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 31 (02) : 154 - 160
  • [39] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MOLECULAR METHODS FOR DETECTION OF MYCOPLASMA SYNOVIAE
    Domanska-Blicharz, Katarzyna
    Tomczyk, Grzegorz
    Minta, Zenon
    BULLETIN OF THE VETERINARY INSTITUTE IN PULAWY, 2009, 53 (03) : 357 - 360
  • [40] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MOLECULAR METHODS FOR DETECTION OF MYCOPLASMA GALLISEPTICUM
    Domanska-Blicharz, Katarzyna
    Tomczyk, Grzegorz
    Minta, Zenon
    BULLETIN OF THE VETERINARY INSTITUTE IN PULAWY, 2008, 52 (04) : 529 - 532