COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT PHENOTYPIC METHODS FOR AmpC DETECTION

被引:0
|
作者
Rashid, Mohd. [1 ]
Naim, Huma [1 ]
Khalid, Mohd. [2 ]
Shukla, Indu [3 ]
机构
[1] FH Med Coll, Dept Microbiol, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Hakeem Rais Unani Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Kulliyat, Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] AMU, JNMC, Dept Microbiol, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
AmpC beta-Lactamase; Double Disk Synergy Test; 3D Extract; Boronic Acid; AmpC Disk Test;
D O I
10.14260/jemds/2018/681
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND AmpC beta-lactamases are clinically important cephalosporinases which confer resistance to cephamycins, penicillins, aminoglycosides and beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and produced in several Enterobacteriaceae. The aim of this study was to compare various phenotypic detection methods of AmpC beta-Lactamases. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a descriptive study. Three hundred multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates were tested for AmpC beta-lactamase enzyme production. Cefoxitin (30 mu g) resistance was used as the screening test for AmpC enzyme detection. Phenotypic confirmation was done by conventional disk combination method (Cefoxitin/cefoxitin + boronic acid), 3D extract method, double disk synergy test (DDST) and AmpC disk test. RESULTS All 300 strains were found to be AmpC positive by the screening test. Out of these 300 strains, 100 strains were positive by disk combination method, 107 strains by DDST, 111 strains by 3D extract method and 170 strains by AmpC disk test. CONCLUSION Cefoxitin resistance can be used as the screening test for AmpC. AmpC disc test is simple to perform. Many strains can be checked on single petri plate and get best results in comparison to other methods of AmpC detection. So, it can be used as a phenotypic method for detection of AmpC enzyme production in resource-limited settings, where genotypic detection methods are not available.
引用
收藏
页码:3032 / 3037
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of different methods for SNP detection in grapevine
    Troggio, M.
    Malacarne, G.
    Vezzulli, S.
    Faes, G.
    Salmaso, M.
    Velasco, R.
    VITIS, 2008, 47 (01) : 21 - 30
  • [22] Comparison of different detection methods in quantitative microdensitometry
    Ermert, L
    Hocke, AC
    Duncker, HR
    Seeger, W
    Ermert, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2001, 158 (02): : 407 - 417
  • [23] Comparison of Different Methods for Carbohydrate Disorder Detection
    Daskalova, Ivona
    Totomirova, Tzvetelina
    Petrov, Nikolay
    DIABETES, 2018, 67
  • [24] Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of environmental isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Atzel, Bela
    Szoboszlay, Sandor
    Mikuska, Zsolt
    Kriszt, Balazs
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2008, 211 (1-2) : 143 - 155
  • [25] Comparison of phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of clarithromycin resistance in Mycobacterium avium
    Thiermann, S
    Munzinger, J
    Bodmer, T
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 49 (04) : 679 - 681
  • [26] Comparison of phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae
    Bartolini, Andrea
    Frasson, Ilaria
    Cavallaro, Antonietta
    Richter, Sara N.
    Palu, Giorgio
    GUT PATHOGENS, 2014, 6
  • [27] Comparison of PCR and phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Madhavan, Anitha
    Sachu, Arun
    Balakrishnan, Anukumar
    Vasudevan, Anu
    Balakrishnan, Sobha
    Vasudevapanicker, Jayalakshmi
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 13 (01) : 31 - 36
  • [28] COMPARISON OF MOLECULAR AND PHENOTYPIC METHODS FOR THE DETECTION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBAPENEM RESISTANT ENTEROBACTERIACEAE
    Somily, Ali M.
    Garaween, Ghada A.
    Abukhalid, Norah
    Absar, Muhammad M.
    Senok, Abiola C.
    ACTA MICROBIOLOGICA ET IMMUNOLOGICA HUNGARICA, 2016, 63 (01) : 69 - 81
  • [29] Comparison of Various Phenotypic Methods and mecA Based PCR for the Detection of MRSA
    Pramodhini, S.
    Thenmozhivalli, P. R.
    Selvi, R.
    Dillirani, V
    Vasumathi, A.
    Agatha, D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (07) : 1359 - 1362
  • [30] Comparison of phenotypic methods for the detection of carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae
    Andrea Bartolini
    Ilaria Frasson
    Antonietta Cavallaro
    Sara N Richter
    Giorgio Palù
    Gut Pathogens, 6