Six Sigma critical success factors in Brazilian industry

被引:25
作者
de Jesus, Abel Ribeiro [1 ]
Antony, Jiju [2 ]
Lepikson, Herman Augusto [1 ]
Peixoto, Adriano L. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Bahia, Polytech Sch, Dept Mech Engn, Salvador, BA, Brazil
[2] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Management & Languages, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Univ Fed Bahia, Inst Psychol, Salvador, BA, Brazil
关键词
Six Sigma; Survey; Quality; Critical success factors; Industries in Brazil;
D O I
10.1108/IJQRM-08-2014-0120
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify critical success factors (CSFs) that are regarded as the most important in Six Sigma programs in Brazil and to compare these rankings with those in international literature. Design/methodology/approach - A sample of industrial companies was selected to complete a survey. In total, 104 questionnaires were obtained. The results were compared with a literature review consisting of 26 papers from 13 countries. In total, 70 CSFs were found in the papers, but 19 CSFs were analyzed and reduced to ten. A multivariate factor analysis further reduced this number to two underlying constructs. Findings - The authors identified a CSFs common denominator/ranking based on the sample of international articles. The authors found that there are four CSFs that are more prevalent in Brazil and in the international papers studied and that there are no differences between the importance of CSFs in terms of hierarchical levels. Three gaps, five levers and two CSFs constructs were identified. Social implications - This study may initiate cooperation between the studied companies and academia, thus possibly increasing these organization' knowledge regarding Six Sigma. Originality/value - The originality of this study is that the survey was conducted with companies in Brazil, a country where little information exists on Six Sigma programs. The authors also contributed a literature review on CSFs, a comparison based on most of the consulted papers and the use of a robust methodological strategy that was made possible by the sample size.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 723
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2002, THE TQM MAGAZINE
  • [2] Antony J., 2009, MANAGE RES NEWS, V32, P413
  • [3] Antony J., 2004, MANAGERIAL AUDITING, V19, P1006, DOI DOI 10.1108/02686900410557908
  • [4] Antony J., 2004, TQM MAGAZINE, V16, P303, DOI DOI 10.1108/09544780410541945
  • [5] Six Sigma vs TQM: some perspectives from leading practitioners and academics
    Antony, Jiju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 58 (03) : 274 - 279
  • [6] Six sigma in service organisations Benefits, challenges and difficulties, common myths, empirical observations and success factors
    Antony, Jiju
    Antony, Frenie Jiju
    Kumar, Maneesh
    Cho, Byung Rae
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 24 (03) : 294 - +
  • [7] REFLECTIVE PRACTICE What is the role of academic institutions for the future development of Six Sigma?
    Antony, Jiju
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY AND PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 57 (01) : 107 - 110
  • [8] Arnheiter E.D., 2005, THE TQM MAGAZINE, V17, P5, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780510573020, DOI 10.1108/09544780510573020]
  • [9] Innovation in management system by Six Sigma: an empirical study of world-class companies
    Azis, Yudi
    Osada, Hiroshi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2010, 1 (03) : 172 - 190
  • [10] Banuelas R., 2002, MEASURING BUSINESS E, V6, P20, DOI DOI 10.1108/13683040210451679