Derivation of Two Critical Appraisal Scores for Trainees to Evaluate Online Educational Resources: A METRIQ Study

被引:49
作者
Chan, Teresa M. [1 ]
Thoma, Brent [2 ]
Krishnan, Keeth [3 ]
Lin, Michelle [4 ]
Carpenter, Christopher R. [5 ]
Astin, Matt [6 ]
Kulasegaram, Kulamakan [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Div Emergency Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Emergency Med, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Undergrad Med Educ, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Washington Univ, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[6] Mercer Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Dept Internal Med, Macon, GA 31207 USA
[7] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Hlth Network, Wilson Ctr Hlth Profess Educ, Dept Emergency Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Critical Appraisal; Blogs; Podcasts; Scoring System;
D O I
10.5811/westjem.2016.6.30825
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Introduction: Online education resources (OERs), like blogs and podcasts, increasingly augment or replace traditional medical education resources such as textbooks and lectures. Trainees' ability to evaluate these resources is poor, and few quality assessment aids have been developed to assist them. This study aimed to derive a quality evaluation instrument for this purpose. Methods: We used a three-phase methodology. In Phase 1, a previously derived list of 151 OER quality indicators was reduced to 13 items using data from published consensus-building studies (of medical educators, expert podcasters, and expert bloggers) and subsequent evaluation by our team. In Phase 2, these 13 items were converted to seven-point Likert scales used by trainee raters (n=40) to evaluate 39 OERs. The reliability and usability of these 13 rating items was determined using responses from trainee raters, and top items were used to create two OER quality evaluation instruments. In Phase 3, these instruments were compared to an external certification process (the ALiEM AIR certification) and the gestalt evaluation of the same 39 blog posts by 20 faculty educators. Results: Two quality-evaluation instruments were derived with fair inter-rater reliability: the METRIQ-8 Score (Inter class correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.30, p<0.001) and the METRIQ-5 Score (ICC=0.22, p<0.001). Both scores, when calculated using the derivation data, correlated with educator gestalt (Pearson's r=0.35, p=0.03 and r=0.41, p<0.01, respectively) and were related to increased odds of receiving an ALiEM AIR certification (odds ratio=1.28, p=0.03; OR=1.5, p=0.004, respectively). Conclusion: Two novel scoring instruments with adequate psychometric properties were derived to assist trainees in evaluating OER quality and correlated favourably with gestalt ratings of online educational resources by faculty educators. Further testing is needed to ensure these instruments are accurate when applied by trainees.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 584
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AIR SER
[2]  
CACMS STANDARDS AND ELEMENTS, 2015, CACMS STANDARDS ELEM
[3]   Free Open Access Meducation (FOAM): the rise of emergency medicine and critical care blogs and podcasts (2002-2013) [J].
Cadogan, Mike ;
Thoma, Brent ;
Chan, Teresa M. ;
Lin, Michelle .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2014, 31 (E1) :E76-E77
[4]   Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) Rater Scores Correlate With Publications' Future Citations [J].
Carpenter, Christopher R. ;
Sarli, Cathy C. ;
Fowler, Susan A. ;
Kulasegaram, Kulamakan ;
Vallera, Teresa ;
Lapaine, Pierre ;
Schalet, Grant ;
Worster, Andrew .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2013, 20 (10) :1004-1012
[5]   DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices [J].
Charnock, D ;
Shepperd, S ;
Needham, G ;
Gann, R .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1999, 53 (02) :105-111
[6]  
Dillman DA, 1999, MAIL INTERNET SURVEY
[7]   Graduate medical education training in clinical epidemiology, critical appraisal, and evidence-based medicine: A critical review of curricula [J].
Green, ML .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (06) :686-694
[8]  
Guyatt GH, 2015, USERS GUIDE MED LIT
[9]   Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via observation: a conceptual model [J].
Kogan, Jennifer R. ;
Conforti, Lisa ;
Bernabeo, Elizabeth ;
Iobst, William ;
Holmboe, Eric .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 45 (10) :1048-1060
[10]  
Krishnan K, 2016, CAN C MED ED ACC SEL