Utility of noninvasive ventilation in high-risk patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

被引:7
作者
Angel Folgado, Miguel [1 ]
De la Serna, Carlos [2 ]
Llorente, Alfonso [1 ]
Rodriguez, S. J. [2 ]
Ochoa, Carlos [3 ]
Diaz-Lobato, Salvador [4 ]
机构
[1] Virgen Concha Hosp, Dept Emergency, Zamora, Spain
[2] Virgen Concha Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol Serv, Zamora, Spain
[3] Virgen Concha Hosp, Invest Unit, Zamora, Spain
[4] Ramon y Cajal Teaching Hosp, Dept Pneumol, Carretera Colmenar Viejo,Km 9,100, Madrid 28034, Spain
关键词
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; high-risk patients; noninvasive ventilation;
D O I
10.4103/0970-2113.142097
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is little evidence on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) preventing respiratory complications in high-risk patients undergoing endoscopy procedures. Objectives: The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the application of NIV through a nasal interface can prevent the appearance of ventilatory alterations during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with risk factors associated with the development of hypoventilation. Patients and Methods: A non-randomized interventional study was performed on 37 consecutive high-risk patients undergoing ERCP. During the procedure, 21 patients received oxygen by nasal cannula (3 L/minute) and sixteen received NIV through a nasal mask. Arterial blood gas analyses were conducted before and immediately after the ERCP. An Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) score pre-ERCP was recorded. The complications during the procedure were recorded. Results: The groups with and without NIV were comparable. A post-ERCP pH of <7.35 was found in eight patients, who did not receive ventilatory support (38.1%) compared to zero patients in the NIV group (P = 0.006). A post-ERCP pCO(2) >45 mmHg was found in one case (6.3%) in the NIV-group and in nine cases in the nasal cannula group (42.9%: P = 0.01). The median pCO(2) post-ERCP was lower (36.5 +/- 6.2 vs. 44.5 +/- 6.8 mmHg) (P = 0.001) and median pH post-ERCP was higher (7.41 +/- 0.4 vs. 7.34 +/- 0.5) (P = 0.001) in patients treated with NIV. In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for gender, the APACHE score, pH and pCO(2) pre-ERCP, age, propofol doses, and procedure duration, the following differences were maintained (pCO(2) difference = 5.54, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) =2.3 - 8.7, pH difference = 0.047, and 95% CI = 0.013 - 0.081). Among the 37 procedures, four complications occurred: One in the NIV group and three in the nasal cannula group. None of them was related to NIV. Conclusions: Our preliminary results demonstrate that in high-risk patients undergoing ERCP, hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis are frequent. NIV prevents the appearance of these complications.
引用
收藏
页码:331 / 335
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STANDARDS OF SEDATION AND PATIENT MONITORING DURING GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY [J].
BELL, GD ;
MCCLOY, RF ;
CHARLTON, JE ;
CAMPBELL, D ;
DENT, NA ;
GEAR, MWL ;
LOGAN, RFA ;
SWAN, CHJ .
GUT, 1991, 32 (07) :823-827
[2]   Noninvasive ventilation allows gastrostomy tube placement in patients with advanced ALS [J].
Boitano, LJ ;
Jordan, T ;
Benditt, JO .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (03) :413-414
[3]   Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy [J].
Campo, R ;
Brullet, E ;
Montserrat, A ;
Calvet, X ;
Moix, J ;
Rué, M ;
Roqué, M ;
Donoso, L ;
Bordas, JM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 11 (02) :201-204
[4]  
Chiner E, 2005, ARCH BRONCONEUMOL, V41, P698, DOI 10.1016/S1579-2129(06)60337-6
[5]  
Cohen J, OVERVIEW PROCEDURAL
[6]  
Faigel DO, 2002, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V56, P613
[7]   CONSCIOUS SEDATION FOR GASTROSCOPY - PATIENT TOLERANCE AND CARDIORESPIRATORY PARAMETERS [J].
FROEHLICH, F ;
SCHWIZER, W ;
THORENS, J ;
KOHLER, M ;
GONVERS, JJ ;
FRIED, M .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :697-704
[8]   Sedation and analgesia for colonoscopy: Patient tolerance, pain, and cardiorespiratory parameters [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Thorens, J ;
Schwizer, W ;
Preisig, M ;
Kohler, M ;
Hays, RD ;
Fried, M ;
Gonvers, JJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 45 (01) :1-9
[9]   Pulse oximetry and supplemental oxygen during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A critical review [J].
Holm, C ;
Rosenberg, J .
ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 28 (08) :703-711
[10]   SEDATION AND ANALGESIA FOR ENDOSCOPY [J].
KEEFFE, EB .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (03) :932-934