Cranial ultrasound for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis. A retrospective cohort study

被引:17
作者
Croft, A. P. [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, N. [3 ]
Duddy, M. J. [4 ]
Barton, C. [5 ]
Khattak, F. [6 ]
Mollan, S. P. [7 ]
Jobanputra, P. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Res Labs, Ctr Translat Inflammat Res, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Res Labs, Ctr Translat Inflammat Res, Rheumatol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Nottingham Univ NHS Trusts, Dept Oncol & Radiotherapy, Oncol, Nottingham, England
[4] Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Dept Radiol, Birmingham B15 2TH, W Midlands, England
[5] West Midlands Workforce Deanery, Fdn Year One, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[6] Sandwell & West Birmingham NHS Trust, Dept Rheumatol, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[7] Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Birmingham Neuroophthalmol Unit, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[8] Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Dept Rheumatol, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham B15 2TH, W Midlands, England
关键词
colour Doppler ultrasound; giant cell arteritis; sensitivity; specificity; temporal artery;
D O I
10.4997/JRCPE.2015.403
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Establishing a diagnosis of giant cell arteritis, or indeed ruling it out, may be difficult. We describe an evaluation of temporal artery colour duplex ultrasound as first line investigation in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing colour duplex ultrasound for suspected giant cell arteritis between January 2005 and January 2014 was undertaken at a teaching hospital. A minimum clinical follow-up of three months was required. Patients were classified on the basis of ultrasound reports, using described features such as a halo sign or arterial wall thickening and clinical diagnosis of giant cell arteritis after at least 3 months follow-up, determined by the treating physician. The relationship of colour duplex ultrasound to a final clinical diagnosis of giant cell arteritis was analysed. Results: A total of 87 patients underwent colour duplex ultrasound: 36 (41%) had clinically confirmed giant cell arteritis at 3-month follow-up. The positive predictive value of colour duplex ultrasound for a clinical diagnosis at 3 months was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI) 93 to 99%) and negative predictive value 88% (95% CI 76 to 95%). Sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 64 to 92%) and specificity 98% (95% CI 90 to 100%). Conclusions: A high positive and negative predictive value of arteritis on colour duplex ultrasound indicates that temporal artery biopsy may be unnecessary in suspected giant cell arteritis, particularly where clinical suspicion of giant cell arteritis is high or low.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 271
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] The diagnostic value of ultrasonography-derived edema of the temporal artery wall in giant cell arteritis: a second meta-analysis
    Arida, Aikaterini
    Kyprianou, Miltiades
    Kanakis, Meletios
    Sfikakis, Petros P.
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2010, 11
  • [2] EULAR points to consider in the development of classification and diagnostic criteria in systemic vasculitis
    Basu, Neil
    Watts, Richard
    Bajema, Ingeborg
    Baslund, Bo
    Bley, Thorsten
    Boers, Maarten
    Brogan, Paul
    Calabrese, Len
    Cid, Maria C.
    Cohen-Tervaert, Jan Willem
    Flores-Suarez, Luis Felipe
    Fujimoto, Shouichi
    de Groot, Kirsten
    Guillevin, Loic
    Hatemi, Gulen
    Hauser, Thomas
    Jayne, David
    Jennette, Charles
    Kallenberg, Cees G. M.
    Kobayashi, Shigeto
    Little, Mark A.
    Mahr, Alfred
    McLaren, John
    Merkel, Peter A.
    Ozen, Seza
    Puechal, Xavier
    Rasmussen, Niels
    Salama, Alan
    Salvarani, Carlo
    Savage, Caroline
    Scott, David G. I.
    Segelmark, Marten
    Specks, Ulrich
    Sunderkoeetter, Cord
    Suzuki, Kazuo
    Tesar, Vladimir
    Wiik, Allan
    Yazici, Hasan
    Luqmani, Raashid
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2010, 69 (10) : 1744 - 1750
  • [3] Brenner H, 1997, STAT MED, V16, P981, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970515)16:9<981::AID-SIM510>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-N
  • [5] BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis
    Dasgupta, Bhaskar
    Borg, Frances A.
    Hassan, Nada
    Alexander, Leslie
    Barraclough, Kevin
    Bourke, Brian
    Fulcher, Joan
    Hollywood, Jane
    Hutchings, Andrew
    James, Pat
    Kyle, Valerie
    Nott, Jennifer
    Power, Michael
    Samanta, Ash
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (08) : 1594 - 1597
  • [6] Verification problems in diagnostic accuracy studies: consequences and solutions
    de Groot, Joris A. H.
    Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Rutjes, Anne W. S.
    Dendukuri, Nandini
    Janssen, Kristel J. M.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
  • [7] De Miguel E, 2012, CLIN EXP RHEUMATOL, V30, pS34
  • [8] Long-term inflammation in the temporal artery of a giant cell arteritis patient as detected by ultrasound
    Diamantopoulos, Andreas P.
    Myklebust, Geirmund
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE, 2014, 6 (03) : 102 - 103
  • [9] Biopsy-negative giant cell arteritis: Clinical spectrum and predictive factors for positive temporal artery biopsy
    Gonzalez-Gay, MA
    Garcia-Porrua, C
    Llorca, J
    Gonzalez-Louzao, C
    Rodriguez-Ledo, P
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2001, 30 (04) : 249 - 256
  • [10] HUNDER GG, 1990, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V33, P1122