PROPHYLACTIC ADMINISTRATION OF GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR (FILGRASTIM) AFTER CONVENTIONAL CHEMOTHERAPY IN CHILDREN WITH CANCER

被引:27
作者
RIIKONEN, P
RAHIALA, J
SALONVAARA, M
PERKKIO, M
机构
[1] Kuopio University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kuopio, Kuopio
关键词
CANCER; CHILDREN; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; FILGRASTIM; G-CSF;
D O I
10.1002/stem.5530130310
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as an adjunct to courses of conventional chemotherapy in 16 children with cancer. One course followed by G-CSF (20 episodes) was compared to identical courses without G-CSF (20 episodes) in the same patients. The mean duration of G-CSF therapy was 8.8 (5-13) days, The periods of neutropenia (4.8 days versus 16.5 days;p < 0.0001), days of hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (13 days versus 65 days; p = 0.02) and days on broad-spectrum antibiotics (13 days versus 95 days; p = 0.003) were significantly reduced. With the use of G-CSF the profound neutropenia could be prevented in 11 (55%) episodes, There were two episodes of fever and neutropenia in the G-CSF group as compared to 10 febrile neutropenias in the control group (p = 0.04). G-CSF was well tolerated and did not cause additional expenses when compared to the expenses needed for the treatment of febrile neutropenias, The cost benefit analyses showed that through using G-CSF a savings was realized in the amount of U.S. $20,650 for 20 cycles of chemotherapy, i.e, U.S. $1,033/chemotherapy cycle, We conclude that the use of G-CSF was efficacious and did not increase the total costs of therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 294
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Pizzo PA, Hathorn JW, Hiemenz J, Et al., A randomized trial comparing ceftazidime alone with combination antibiotic therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia, N Engl J Med, 315, pp. 552-558, (1986)
[2]  
Shenep JL, Hughes WT, Roberson PK, Et al., Vancomycin, ticarcillin, and amikacin compared with ticarcillin‐clavulate and amikacin in the empirical treatment of febrile, neutropenic children with cancer, N Engl J Med, 319, pp. 1053-1058, (1988)
[3]  
Riikonen P, Imipenem compared with ceftazidime plus vancomycin as initial therapy for fever in neutropenic children with cancer, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 10, pp. 918-923, (1991)
[4]  
Lieschke GJ, Burgess AW, Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor. Pt. 1, N Engl J Med, 327, pp. 28-35, (1992)
[5]  
Lieschke GJ, Burgess AW, Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor and granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor. Pt. 2, N Engl J Med, 372, pp. 99-106, (1992)
[6]  
Saarinen UM, Hovi L, Riikonen P, Et al., Recombinant human granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor in children with chemotherapy‐induced neutropenia, Med Pediatr Oncol, 20, pp. 489-496, (1992)
[7]  
Riikonen P, Saarinen UM, Makipernaa A, Et al., Recombinant human granulocyte‐macrophage colony stimulating factor in the treatment of febrile neutropenia: a double‐blind placebo controlled study in children, Pediatr Infect Dis J, 13, pp. 197-202, (1994)
[8]  
Furman WL, Fairclough DL, Huhn RD, Et al., Therapeutic effects and pharmacokinetics of recombinant human granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor in childhood cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, J Clin Oncol, 9, pp. 1022-1028, (1991)
[9]  
Furman WL, Crist WM, Potential uses of recombinant human granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor in children, Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 13, pp. 388-399, (1991)
[10]  
Lie SO, Gustafsson G, Progress in the treatment of childhood leukemias, Ann Med, 24, pp. 319-323, (1992)