Sensitivity of ERS-1 and JERS-1 radar data to biomass and stand structure in Alaskan boreal forest

被引:109
作者
Harrell, PA [1 ]
BourgeauChavez, LL [1 ]
Kasischke, ES [1 ]
French, NHF [1 ]
Christensen, NL [1 ]
机构
[1] ENVIRONM RES INST MICHIGAN,CTR EARTH SCI,ANN ARBOR,MI 48107
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0034-4257(95)00127-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Thirty-two boreal forest sites were identified and sampled in the central region of Alaska to evaluate the sensitivity of the C-band ERS-1 and the L-band JERS-1 radar platforms to site biophysical properties. A growing body of research has shown a significant radar backscatter response to biomass in a variety of forest systems. Alaskan boreal forests may be well suited to radar remote sensing. The sites selected represent black spruce (Picea mariana) and white spruce (Picea glauca) stands in a post-fire chronosequence. Black spruce biomass ranged from less than 1 kg/m(2) to 5.6 kg/m(2) and white spruce from 8.8 to 21.5 kg/m(2). Results indicate both ERS-1 and JERS-1 backscatter is responsive to biomass, density, and height, though other factors, principally surface moisture conditions, are often a stronger influence. Sensitivity to forest biomass and structure appears greatest when surface moisture conditions are minimized as a factor. Biomass correlations with the radar backscatter were strongest in the late winter Imagery when all sites had a snow cover, and late summer when the surface is most dry. ERS-1 data may be more sensitive to surface moisture conditions than the JERS-1 data due to the shorter wavelength of the C-band sensor, though this is inconclusive because of limited JERS-1 L-band data for comparison. Also, though the ERS-1 platform has proved to provide a very stable signal, results must be interpreted with caution as the dynamic range for our study sites is often less than 4 dB, and the uncertainty of the backscatter estimate is +/- 1.5 dB.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 260
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   SEASONAL-CHANGES IN RELATIVE C-BAND BACKSCATTER OF NORTHERN FOREST COVER TYPES [J].
AHERN, FJ ;
LECKIE, DJ ;
DRIEMAN, JA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1993, 31 (03) :668-680
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, GLOBAL BIOMASS BURNI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ANAL TIME SERIES INT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1974, AIMS METHODS VEGETAT
[5]   BIOMASS DISTRIBUTION AND CROWN CHARACTERISTICS IN 2 ALASKAN PICEA-MARIANA ECOSYSTEMS [J].
BARNEY, RJ ;
VANCLEVE, K ;
SCHLENTNER, R .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1978, 8 (01) :36-41
[6]  
BARNEY RJ, 1971, FIRE NO ENV S, P51
[7]   THE SENSITIVITY OF SOME HIGH-LATITUDE BOREAL FORESTS TO CLIMATIC PARAMETERS [J].
BONAN, GB ;
SHUGART, HH ;
URBAN, DL .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1990, 16 (01) :9-29
[8]   ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS AND ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN BOREAL FORESTS [J].
BONAN, GB ;
SHUGART, HH .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1989, 20 :1-28
[9]   A COMPUTER-MODEL OF THE SOLAR-RADIATION, SOIL-MOISTURE, AND SOIL THERMAL REGIMES IN BOREAL FORESTS [J].
BONAN, GB .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1989, 45 (04) :275-306
[10]  
BONAN GB, 1992, CAN J FOREST RES, V22, P626