What Is the "Subaltern" of the Philosophy of Religion?

被引：0
作者：
Bilimoria, Purushottama [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Filosofia & Estudos Comparados, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Deakin Univ, Geelong, Vic, Australia
来源：
NUMEN-REVISTA DE ESTUDOS E PESQUISA DA RELIGIAO | 2011年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词：
Philosophy of Religion; Subaltern Studies; Indian Philosophy; Reason;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号：
010107 ;
摘要：
Despite recent history and the present-day ethnocentric melange into which reason might have descended, the article attempts to boldly defend an unassailable commitment to rationality and theories of reason in classical Indian philosophy. In the light of that 'subaltern' heritage, the article re-visits critically contemporary scholarship in the sphere of philosophy of religion.
引用
收藏
页码：13 / 57
页数：45
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Almond Philip, 1988, BRIT DISCOVERY BUDDH
[2]  
ALSTON William P., 1992, FAITH REASON SCEPTIC
[3]  
AMES Roger T, 1989, INTERPRETING BOUNDAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1950, ORIENTAL RENAISSANCE
[5]  
AVATARA Antonio de, 1986, HUMANIZATION PHILOS
[6]  
BHABHA H, 1995, LOCATION CULTURE
[7]  
Bhabha Homi K., 2004, LOCATION CULTURE, V2nd
[8]   HINDU DOUBTS ABOUT GOD - TOWARDS A MIMAMSA DECONSTRUCTION [J].
BILIMORIA, P .
INTERNATIONAL PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 1990, 30 (04) :481-499
[9]  
BILIMORIA P., 2008, INDIAN ETHICS CLASSI
[10]  
BILIMORIA P, 1995, SOPHIA, V34, P92
12345678