INTERVENTIONAL ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS

被引:75
|
作者
LINK, H
MASCHMEYER, G
MEYER, P
HIDDEMANN, W
STILLE, W
HELMERKING, M
ADAM, D
机构
[1] FREE UNIV BERLIN, KLINIKUM RUDOLF VIRCHOW, ROBERT ROSSLE HOSP, DEPT MED ONCOL & APPL MOLEC BIOL, D-13122 BERLIN, GERMANY
[2] UNIV KLIN WURZBURG, MED POLIKLIN, D-97070 WURZBURG, GERMANY
[3] UNIV GOTTINGEN, MED KLIN, DEPT HEMATOL & ONCOL, D-37075 GOTTINGEN, GERMANY
[4] UNIV KLIN FRANKFURT, CTR INTERNAL MED, D-60590 FRANKFURT, GERMANY
[5] PAUL EHRLICH GESELL CHEMOTHERAPY, D-81701 MUNICH, GERMANY
[6] UNIV MUNICH, CHILDRENS HOSP, D-80337 MUNICH, GERMANY
关键词
FEVER; NEUTROPENIA; INFECTION; PNEUMONIA; ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY; ANTIFUNGALS; RISK FACTORS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01700277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this prospective multicenter trial, treatment strategies for 1573 patients with neutropenia < 1000/mu l and fever greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C after cytotoxic chemotherapy were compared. Patients with unexplained fever were randomized to a three-phase sequential study for different established drug regimens. If an infection could be defined microbiologically or clinically, treat ment modifications were determined. In phase I, treatment for all patients consisted of acylaminopenicillin (PEN) plus aminoglycoside (AMG); or third-generation cephalosporin (CEPH) plus AMG; or PEN plus CEPH. In 800 patients with unexplained fever the response rates were: PEN/AMG (n = 258): 74.4%, CEPH/AMG (n = 252): 73.4%; PEN/CEPH (n = 290): 70.0%. Total response rate was 72.5%. In phase II, patients not responding after 3 days received PEN/CEPH/vancomycin (n = 70) or PEN/CEPH/AMG (n = 74). The respective response rates were 52.9% and 55.4%, total 54.2%. If fever did not resolve, the patients received either PEN/CEPH (n = 40) or imipenem/cilastatin (n = 59) both in combination with amphotericin-B/5-flucytosin/rifampin. The response rates were 62.5% and 79.7%, respectively (p = 0.07), total 72.7%. No significant dif ferences between the treatment modalities compared were found. Analyzing all three phases together, 91.3% of patients with unexplained fever were cured. The response rate was also analyzed according to patients with gram-positive bacteremia (n = 183), response rate 82.5%; gram-negative organisms (n = 145) 78.6%; fungemia (n = 51) 43.1% (p < 0.001); lung infiltrates (n = 269) 61.3% (p < 0.001); clinically documented infections (n = 198) 84.4%; and clinically and microbiologically documented infections (n = 84) 82.1%. If infections were diagnosed after at least 5 febrile days, more lung infiltrates and fungal infections occurred (p < 0.001). Leukocytes rising above 500/mu during the infection predicted better response rates (p < 0.001): in unexplained fever 97.8% vs 86.5% and lower death rates 1.5% vs 8.5%. In documented infections the response rates were then 89.9% vs 62.3% and the death rates 7.0% vs 20.5%. Therapy of neutropenic fever and infections must be adapted according to risk factors and should include early empiric antifungal therapy. The therapeutic and prophylactic use of hematopoietic growth factors to overcome neutropenia should be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 243
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients in Korea
    Lee, Dong-Gun
    Choi, Su-Mi
    Shin, Wan-Shik
    Lah, Hyon-Oh
    Yim, Dong-Seok
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2006, 28 (04) : 333 - 339
  • [42] Outpatient treatment with intravenous antimicrobial therapy and oral levofloxacin in patients with febrile neutropenia and hematological malignancies
    Bellesso, Marcelo
    Costa, Silvia Figueiredo
    Pracchia, Luis Fernando
    Santos Dias, Lucia Cristina
    Chamone, Dalton
    Dorlhiac-Llacer, Pedro Enrique
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2011, 90 (04) : 455 - 462
  • [43] Plasma levels of procalcitonin and eight additional inflammatory molecules in febrile neutropenic patients
    Neuenschwander, Leticia Carvalho
    Bittencourt, Henrique
    Flavia, Ana
    Ribeiro, Tiburcio
    Teixeira, Antonio Lucio
    Teixeira, Mauro M.
    Teixeira, Jairo Cerqueira
    Nobre, Vandack
    CLINICS, 2011, 66 (10) : 1699 - 1705
  • [44] Risk stratification in febrile neutropenic episodes in adolescent/young adult patients with cancer
    Phillips, Robert S.
    Bhuller, Kaljit
    Sung, Lillian
    Ammann, Roland A.
    Tissing, Wim J. E.
    Lehrnbecher, Thomas
    Stewart, Lesley A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 64 : 101 - 106
  • [45] OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF FEBRILE EPISODES IN LOW-RISK NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH CANCER
    RUBENSTEIN, EB
    ROLSTON, K
    BENJAMIN, RS
    LOEWY, J
    ESCALANTE, C
    MANZULLO, E
    HUGHES, P
    MORELAND, B
    FENDER, A
    KENNEDY, K
    HOLMES, F
    ELTING, L
    BODEY, GP
    CANCER, 1993, 71 (11) : 3640 - 3646
  • [46] Frequency of bloodstream infection in febrile neutropenic patients, experience from a developing country
    Siddiqui, Basit
    Azmat, Rabeea
    Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder
    Rafi, Shumaila
    Syed, Beenish
    Khan, Muhammad Tahir
    Rehman, Hareem
    Paracha, Saleemullah
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2018, 34 : 71 - 74
  • [47] AMBULATORY TREATMENT WITH CEFTRIAXONE IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CHILDREN
    KAPLINSKY, C
    DRUCKER, M
    GOSHEN, J
    TAMARY, H
    COHEN, IJ
    ZAIZOV, R
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 30 (08): : 649 - 651
  • [48] Risk index score for bacteremia in febrile neutropenic episodes in children with malignancies
    Spasova, M. I.
    Grudeva-Popova, J. G.
    Kostyanev, S. S.
    Genev, E. D.
    Stoyanova, A. A.
    Kirina, V. I.
    Moumdjiev, I. N.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2009, 14 (03): : 411 - 418
  • [49] Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in a febrile neutropenic patient
    Blank, M
    Chowdhury, M
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 23 (03) : 130 - 132
  • [50] Cancer patients with neutropenic septic shock: etiology and antimicrobial resistance
    Jung, Sung Min
    Kim, Youn-Jung
    Ryoo, Seung Mok
    Sohn, Chang Hwan
    Seo, Dong-Woo
    Lim, Kyoung Soo
    Kim, Won Young
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (04) : 979 - 987