INTERVENTIONAL ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS

被引:75
|
作者
LINK, H
MASCHMEYER, G
MEYER, P
HIDDEMANN, W
STILLE, W
HELMERKING, M
ADAM, D
机构
[1] FREE UNIV BERLIN, KLINIKUM RUDOLF VIRCHOW, ROBERT ROSSLE HOSP, DEPT MED ONCOL & APPL MOLEC BIOL, D-13122 BERLIN, GERMANY
[2] UNIV KLIN WURZBURG, MED POLIKLIN, D-97070 WURZBURG, GERMANY
[3] UNIV GOTTINGEN, MED KLIN, DEPT HEMATOL & ONCOL, D-37075 GOTTINGEN, GERMANY
[4] UNIV KLIN FRANKFURT, CTR INTERNAL MED, D-60590 FRANKFURT, GERMANY
[5] PAUL EHRLICH GESELL CHEMOTHERAPY, D-81701 MUNICH, GERMANY
[6] UNIV MUNICH, CHILDRENS HOSP, D-80337 MUNICH, GERMANY
关键词
FEVER; NEUTROPENIA; INFECTION; PNEUMONIA; ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY; ANTIFUNGALS; RISK FACTORS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01700277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this prospective multicenter trial, treatment strategies for 1573 patients with neutropenia < 1000/mu l and fever greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C after cytotoxic chemotherapy were compared. Patients with unexplained fever were randomized to a three-phase sequential study for different established drug regimens. If an infection could be defined microbiologically or clinically, treat ment modifications were determined. In phase I, treatment for all patients consisted of acylaminopenicillin (PEN) plus aminoglycoside (AMG); or third-generation cephalosporin (CEPH) plus AMG; or PEN plus CEPH. In 800 patients with unexplained fever the response rates were: PEN/AMG (n = 258): 74.4%, CEPH/AMG (n = 252): 73.4%; PEN/CEPH (n = 290): 70.0%. Total response rate was 72.5%. In phase II, patients not responding after 3 days received PEN/CEPH/vancomycin (n = 70) or PEN/CEPH/AMG (n = 74). The respective response rates were 52.9% and 55.4%, total 54.2%. If fever did not resolve, the patients received either PEN/CEPH (n = 40) or imipenem/cilastatin (n = 59) both in combination with amphotericin-B/5-flucytosin/rifampin. The response rates were 62.5% and 79.7%, respectively (p = 0.07), total 72.7%. No significant dif ferences between the treatment modalities compared were found. Analyzing all three phases together, 91.3% of patients with unexplained fever were cured. The response rate was also analyzed according to patients with gram-positive bacteremia (n = 183), response rate 82.5%; gram-negative organisms (n = 145) 78.6%; fungemia (n = 51) 43.1% (p < 0.001); lung infiltrates (n = 269) 61.3% (p < 0.001); clinically documented infections (n = 198) 84.4%; and clinically and microbiologically documented infections (n = 84) 82.1%. If infections were diagnosed after at least 5 febrile days, more lung infiltrates and fungal infections occurred (p < 0.001). Leukocytes rising above 500/mu during the infection predicted better response rates (p < 0.001): in unexplained fever 97.8% vs 86.5% and lower death rates 1.5% vs 8.5%. In documented infections the response rates were then 89.9% vs 62.3% and the death rates 7.0% vs 20.5%. Therapy of neutropenic fever and infections must be adapted according to risk factors and should include early empiric antifungal therapy. The therapeutic and prophylactic use of hematopoietic growth factors to overcome neutropenia should be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 243
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A comparison of aztreonam plus vancomycin and imipenem plus vancomycin as initial therapy for febrile neutropenic cancer patients
    Raad, II
    Whimbey, EE
    Rolston, KVI
    AbiSaid, D
    Hachem, RY
    Pandya, RG
    Ghaddar, HM
    Karl, CL
    Bodey, GP
    CANCER, 1996, 77 (07) : 1386 - 1394
  • [22] Evaluation of pulmonary infiltrate in febrile neutropenic patients of hematologic malignancies
    Das, Chandan K.
    Gogia, Ajay
    Kumar, Lalit
    Sharma, Atul
    Thulkar, Sanjay
    Xess, Immaculata
    Madan, Karan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2019, 40 (03) : 386 - 390
  • [23] Computed tomography in the evaluation of febrile neutropenic pediatric oncology patients
    Archibald, S
    Park, J
    Geyer, JR
    Hawkins, DS
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2001, 20 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [24] Identifying neutropenic febrile cancer patients at risk for early death
    Wilbur, DW
    Rentschler, RE
    Couperus, JJ
    Camacho, ES
    Godfrey, TE
    Hilliard, DA
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (05) : 347 - +
  • [25] Importance of pulmonary imaging diagnostics in the management of febrile neutropenic patients
    Heussel, Claus Peter
    MYCOSES, 2011, 54 : 17 - 26
  • [26] Diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of lung infiltrates in febrile neutropenic patients: Guidelines of the infectious diseases working party of the German Society of Haematology and Oncology
    Maschmeyer, Georg
    Beinert, Thomas
    Buchheidt, Dieter
    Cornely, Oliver A.
    Einsele, Hermann
    Heinz, Werner
    Heussel, Claus Peter
    Kahl, Christoph
    Kiehl, Michael
    Lorenz, Joachim
    Hof, Herbert
    Mattiuzzi, Gloria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (14) : 2462 - 2472
  • [27] Antimicrobial therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa - Skin and soft tissue, ear, and eye infections, meningitis, and clinical syndromes of febrile neutropenic and HIV patients
    Kovacs, K
    Paterson, DL
    Yu, VL
    INFECTIONS IN MEDICINE, 1998, 15 (07) : 464 - +
  • [28] Clinical characteristics and outcomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia in febrile neutropenic children and adolescents with the impact of antibiotic resistance: a retrospective study
    Kim, Hyo Sup
    Park, Bo Kyoung
    Kim, Seong Koo
    Han, Seung Beom
    Lee, Jae Wook
    Lee, Dong-Gun
    Chung, Nack-Gyun
    Cho, Bin
    Jeong, Dae Chul
    Kang, Jin Han
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 17
  • [29] How prompt is prompt in daily practice? Earlier initiation of empirical antibacterial therapy for the febrile neutropenic patient
    van Vliet, M.
    Potting, C. M. J.
    Sturm, P. D. J.
    Donnelly, J. P.
    Blijlevens, N. M. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2011, 20 (05) : 679 - 685
  • [30] A comparative study of cefepime versus ceftazidime as empiric therapy of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients
    Wang, FD
    Liu, CY
    Hsu, HC
    Gau, JP
    Chau, WK
    Haung, ML
    Ho, CH
    CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 45 (05) : 370 - 379